Comments on: Who is Mir Hossein Mousavi Really?

By: MFarmer

MFarmer — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:00:52 +0000

And, for heaven’s sake, let’s please not make it about Obama.

By: danbmil99

danbmil99 — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:58:50 +0000

I agree with the article, but what we really should talk about is how someone as seemingly aware of the facts as McCain could make such patently partisan and irresponsible comments about Obama being soft on terror or whatever he said. He knows it’s crap, everyone with a brain knows Obama is doing exactly the right thing — but it’s OK to backbite him because the left wasn’t nice to Bush? is tit-for-tat the way conservatives express their love of Country?Please, let’s cut the hypocrisy, and stand behind our commander in chief when he’s dealing well with a very tough situation.

By: MFarmer

MFarmer — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:26:51 +0000

"Have a problem with assimulation and accomadation there MFarmer?"

Have a problem with spelling Bulldog?

"LOL You have reinerated what I posted."

I assure you -- I did not reinerate anything.

"1. The reports from Iran are all over the net if your attempting to educate yourself and the signs these people carry say "Make MY Vote Count" and "Where is MY Vote" so I think I'm pretty close to base when I say this is the issue."

Yes, they are pissed off at the fact that a totalitarian government rigged the election, among all the other things they are pissed off about regarding a totalitarian government

"2. Mousavi had to go through the interview process just as Ahmadinejad did and had to pass in order to be able to run for office."

Yes, that's why he is not the issue. Thanks.

"3. I refuse to deal with someone who refuses to read an article before commenting as you have done. ALL the ways these men are close in thought is listed above."

I refuse to deal with anyone who assumes I didn't read the article. I did. So, nah-nah-nah.

"4. Do us all a favor and don't reproduce."

Now we get to the substance. You are a formidable Bulldog.

By: krove

krove — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:15:33 +0000

comment of the day on Ensign.

"I was worried there, because a GOPer politician in an illicit heterosexual affair with a consenting adult, sans bondage equipment, stray animals, diapers or any of the other usual Republican sex scandal accouterments, thats just not right. Ah, but now we add bribery and nepotism too, well that restores my faith that god is in her heaven and all is right with the world."

By: krove

krove — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:10:42 +0000

Please can we have a nice juicy John Ensign “Family Values ” Thread.

By: krove

krove — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:08:16 +0000

"Sorry totally off topic but I have to laugh. I see someone has pulled the piece about Republicans needing to embrace women. I thought that was the problem."

along those lines........

Wonkette says.

We knew there had to be a paying off some 19-year-old boy aspect of this dull John Ensign story, and here it is: A Republican committee paid Nevada Senator John Ensigns illicit girlfriends son $5,400 during the SAME EXACT TIME Ensign and the lady were humping. This teen-ager was given the dirty GOP money for research policy consulting, which is even more bogus-sounding that our business expenses. ALSO: Our friends at the Las Vegas Gleaner inform us that Ensign was putting his peen into this lady before he was legally separated from his wife.
From the Las Vegas Review-Journal:

John and Darlene Ensign were separated from April to July 2008, the senators spokesman, Tory Mazzola, confirmed Tuesday evening.

That would indicate the affair began five months before the couple separated and ended a month after they got back together.

AND ADDITIONALLY: Ensign is the star relief pitcher for the GOPs fancy baseball team performing right now at Nationals Park, and he didnt show up for the game. COME ON DUDE IT IS FOR CHARITY STOP BEING A DICK SO MUCH.

There are about nine other bubbling mini-scandals in this oh hell its June, well take it scandal of the year, so go to the aforementioned Las Vegas Gleaner and learn every detail, hurry! [Las Vegas Gleaner

By: midcon

midcon — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:56:19 +0000

Yeah, I noticed that as well. I guess they forgot about the Bohemian Club. Or maybe someone has gotten the message about trivialities.

By: ottovbvs

ottovbvs — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:24:01 +0000

Sorry totally off topic but I have to laugh. I see someone has pulled the piece about Republicans needing to embrace women. I thought that was the problem.

By: Bulldoglover100

Bulldoglover100 — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:23:32 +0000

Have a problem with assimulation and accomadation there MFarmer?

LOL You have reinerated what I posted.
1. The reports from Iran are all over the net if your attempting to educate yourself and the signs these people carry say "Make MY Vote Count" and "Where is MY Vote" so I think I'm pretty close to base when I say this is the issue.
2. Mousavi had to go through the interview process just as Ahmadinejad did and had to pass in order to be able to run for office.
3. I refuse to deal with someone who refuses to read an article before commenting as you have done. ALL the ways these men are close in thought is listed above.
4. Do us all a favor and don't reproduce.

By: MFarmer

MFarmer — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:24:40 +0000

"Both men are so close in the way they will lead that any comparisions are nil but one man was cheated in the minds of the people and THAT is the only issue."

No, THAT is NOT the issue. Besides, you have no idea what's in the people's minds. Neither do I, but from reports, the election fraud was the impetus that let out years of frustration with totalitarianism. People are probably rebelling for diverse reasons. Do you really think all this about one man, Mousavi? Really? They wouldn't be making this much ruckus just for one man who is no different than the other, knowing the Supreme Leader is in charge.