<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Verdict Has The Past Year Rendered On Social Security Reform?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frumforum.com/what-verdict-has-the-past-year-rendered-on-social-security-reform/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frumforum.com/what-verdict-has-the-past-year-rendered-on-social-security-reform</link>
	<description>Building a conservatism that can win again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:50:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan-in-Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/what-verdict-has-the-past-year-rendered-on-social-security-reform/comment-page-1#comment-52126</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan-in-Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-52126</guid>
		<description>JJW, 3 responses.

Are you claiming that the &quot;cross-generational nature of social security&quot; is a positive?  Isn&#039;t that just a nicer way of saying &quot;unfunded pension plan&quot; or &quot;ponzi scheme?&quot;

Do you have any idea how much &quot;nickel and diming&quot; it would take to get workers down to an expected lifetime return as low as the existing system?  I mean, it&#039;d take a whole lot to catch up to the vig the federal government takes out now...

Finally, the program&#039;s not going to survive as is regardless.  There are too many retirees coming and too few people paying into the system.  Don&#039;t blame the coming changes to the program, which are inevitable, on the hope of creating a system that&#039;s self-funded and involves the generation of actual wealth for future participants. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJW, 3 responses.</p>
<p>Are you claiming that the &#8220;cross-generational nature of social security&#8221; is a positive?  Isn&#8217;t that just a nicer way of saying &#8220;unfunded pension plan&#8221; or &#8220;ponzi scheme?&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you have any idea how much &#8220;nickel and diming&#8221; it would take to get workers down to an expected lifetime return as low as the existing system?  I mean, it&#8217;d take a whole lot to catch up to the vig the federal government takes out now&#8230;</p>
<p>Finally, the program&#8217;s not going to survive as is regardless.  There are too many retirees coming and too few people paying into the system.  Don&#8217;t blame the coming changes to the program, which are inevitable, on the hope of creating a system that&#8217;s self-funded and involves the generation of actual wealth for future participants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJWFromME</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/what-verdict-has-the-past-year-rendered-on-social-security-reform/comment-page-1#comment-43837</link>
		<dc:creator>JJWFromME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-43837</guid>
		<description>Private accounts undermines the very cross-generational nature of social security: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_09/014810.php How does the program survive if you&#039;re siphoning off account holders like this? And what about the costs of maintaining the fund? There are a lot of Wall Street types who would like to nickel and dime account holders for all they&#039;re worth.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Private accounts undermines the very cross-generational nature of social security: <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_09/014810.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_09/014810.php</a> How does the program survive if you&#8217;re siphoning off account holders like this? And what about the costs of maintaining the fund? There are a lot of Wall Street types who would like to nickel and dime account holders for all they&#8217;re worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

