<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Most Hated Conservatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frumforum.com/were-number-3/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frumforum.com/were-number-3</link>
	<description>Building a conservatism that can win again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:50:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joedee1969</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/were-number-3/comment-page-2#comment-66220</link>
		<dc:creator>joedee1969</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=12816#comment-66220</guid>
		<description>David needs his own TV show read this:

http://americaspeaksink.com/2009/09/calm-conservatives-this-is-our-time/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David needs his own TV show read this:</p>
<p><a href="http://americaspeaksink.com/2009/09/calm-conservatives-this-is-our-time/" rel="nofollow">http://americaspeaksink.com/2009/09/calm-conservatives-this-is-our-time/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/were-number-3/comment-page-2#comment-66050</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=12816#comment-66050</guid>
		<description>And before we go rewriting history too completely, I would ask sinz and the rest of the gang here to remember that, in the early 1980&#039;s, the liberals fought Reagan TOOTH AND NAIL for almost no reason other than that he existed.  Reagan&#039;s tent WAS big.  The point is, a lot of ex-leftists are just now coming into it almost 30 years after he invited them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And before we go rewriting history too completely, I would ask sinz and the rest of the gang here to remember that, in the early 1980&#8217;s, the liberals fought Reagan TOOTH AND NAIL for almost no reason other than that he existed.  Reagan&#8217;s tent WAS big.  The point is, a lot of ex-leftists are just now coming into it almost 30 years after he invited them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reactions From The People On The Right Voted &#8220;Least Favorite&#8221; By Conservative Bloggers &#124; Right Wing News</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/were-number-3/comment-page-2#comment-66018</link>
		<dc:creator>Reactions From The People On The Right Voted &#8220;Least Favorite&#8221; By Conservative Bloggers &#124; Right Wing News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=12816#comment-66018</guid>
		<description>[...] but not least, is David Frum from A New Majority: John Hawkins’ poll at Right Wing News names the people on the right most disliked in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but not least, is David Frum from A New Majority: John Hawkins’ poll at Right Wing News names the people on the right most disliked in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nwahs</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/were-number-3/comment-page-2#comment-65980</link>
		<dc:creator>nwahs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=12816#comment-65980</guid>
		<description>sinz54 wrote :&quot;With all due respect to your mom:

There is far LESS hatred today than at any prior point in U.S. history.&quot;

That&#039;s true, but there is far more intellectual dishonesty.  In the early 90&#039;s, in Louisiana, I watched David Duke fashion intellectual dishonesty into a viable piece of the Republican party. Now its true, most portions of the Republican party rebuked him outright,  conservative pundits like Rush Limbaugh simply played hands off - no rebuke. It is in that vein I take Rush Limbaugh&#039;s sly bigotry - his Ebonics translations, and musical numbers lampooning African-Americans ( Jefferson theme song,  The Magic Negro). I&#039;m called out as a &quot;RINO&quot; for not accepting something I witnessed first hand in Louisiana in the early 1990&#039;s. This type of sly bigotry will not fade away. It has to be firmly rebuked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sinz54 wrote :&#8221;With all due respect to your mom:</p>
<p>There is far LESS hatred today than at any prior point in U.S. history.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s true, but there is far more intellectual dishonesty.  In the early 90&#8217;s, in Louisiana, I watched David Duke fashion intellectual dishonesty into a viable piece of the Republican party. Now its true, most portions of the Republican party rebuked him outright,  conservative pundits like Rush Limbaugh simply played hands off &#8211; no rebuke. It is in that vein I take Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s sly bigotry &#8211; his Ebonics translations, and musical numbers lampooning African-Americans ( Jefferson theme song,  The Magic Negro). I&#8217;m called out as a &#8220;RINO&#8221; for not accepting something I witnessed first hand in Louisiana in the early 1990&#8217;s. This type of sly bigotry will not fade away. It has to be firmly rebuked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anniemargret</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/were-number-3/comment-page-2#comment-65965</link>
		<dc:creator>anniemargret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=12816#comment-65965</guid>
		<description>Sinz:   you make good points, and taken in that regard, true.  I think however, that what many older Americans are seeing and hearing is a 24 hour &#039;news&#039; cycle that is predominantly concerned with ratings and entertainment.  There is less debate than there is shouting.  Someone else mentioned Keith Olbermann and/or Ed Schultz as evidence that it nullifies the effects of Beck, etc....

They don&#039;t.  The entire discussion I think should be focused on whether or not Americans can accomplish goals which are in the best interests of its citizens without resorting to talking heads calling half of America....racists, or not &#039;real Americans.&#039;   

What my mother and millions like her is hearing a debased conversation and a ratcheting up of inflammatory language. Yes, both sides do it, because 1) it is reactionary  2) it gets high ratings.   Sorta like not wanting to see that horrible car wreck at the side of the road, but cannot helping to look anyway. 

My point is that regardless whether or not there was violence in our nation&#039;s history, we should be evolving, not devolving.  

Where I don&#039;t agree with you...at all....is that inflammatory language is OK.   It stirs passions alright, but it can also stir violence.   And from that regard, I beg to differ.... we need less of it, not more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sinz:   you make good points, and taken in that regard, true.  I think however, that what many older Americans are seeing and hearing is a 24 hour &#8216;news&#8217; cycle that is predominantly concerned with ratings and entertainment.  There is less debate than there is shouting.  Someone else mentioned Keith Olbermann and/or Ed Schultz as evidence that it nullifies the effects of Beck, etc&#8230;.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t.  The entire discussion I think should be focused on whether or not Americans can accomplish goals which are in the best interests of its citizens without resorting to talking heads calling half of America&#8230;.racists, or not &#8216;real Americans.&#8217;   </p>
<p>What my mother and millions like her is hearing a debased conversation and a ratcheting up of inflammatory language. Yes, both sides do it, because 1) it is reactionary  2) it gets high ratings.   Sorta like not wanting to see that horrible car wreck at the side of the road, but cannot helping to look anyway. </p>
<p>My point is that regardless whether or not there was violence in our nation&#8217;s history, we should be evolving, not devolving.  </p>
<p>Where I don&#8217;t agree with you&#8230;at all&#8230;.is that inflammatory language is OK.   It stirs passions alright, but it can also stir violence.   And from that regard, I beg to differ&#8230;. we need less of it, not more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sinz54</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/were-number-3/comment-page-2#comment-65960</link>
		<dc:creator>sinz54</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=12816#comment-65960</guid>
		<description>anniemargaret: &lt;blockquote&gt; My 87 y/o mother calls me occasionally to complain how awful our country has become….so much hatred everywhere you look. I have no comforting words for her. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
With all due respect to your mom:

There is far &lt;i&gt;LESS&lt;/i&gt; hatred today than at any prior point in U.S. history.

I would ask your mom if she remembers the 1960s, when dozens of U.S. cities were torched by extremists and rioters.  Ask her if she remembers the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago, and what happened in the streets there.  Or the twin assassinations of Robert Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. that same year.  (The King assassination was avenged by black riots across the nation.)

Or the late 1950s and early 1960s, when civil rights demonstrators were beaten and occasionally even murdered in the South.

Or the 1930s, when Father Coughlin was in his heyday.

Or the 1920s, when the Ku Klux Klan was in its heyday.

American politics has always been passionate, messy, and (sometimes) violent.  We used to have actual duels where politicians shot it out, like Burr and Hamilton.

Frankly, I don&#039;t see &quot;hatred everywhere you look&quot; in today&#039;s politics.  Not at all.  I see voters shouting at politicians to obey their masters--the voters who put them in office.  But there is LESS racial hated, and LESS religious animosity, than at any prior time in U.S. history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anniemargaret:  My 87 y/o mother calls me occasionally to complain how awful our country has become….so much hatred everywhere you look. I have no comforting words for her.<br />
With all due respect to your mom:</p>
<p>There is far LESS hatred today than at any prior point in U.S. history.</p>
<p>I would ask your mom if she remembers the 1960s, when dozens of U.S. cities were torched by extremists and rioters.  Ask her if she remembers the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago, and what happened in the streets there.  Or the twin assassinations of Robert Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. that same year.  (The King assassination was avenged by black riots across the nation.)</p>
<p>Or the late 1950s and early 1960s, when civil rights demonstrators were beaten and occasionally even murdered in the South.</p>
<p>Or the 1930s, when Father Coughlin was in his heyday.</p>
<p>Or the 1920s, when the Ku Klux Klan was in its heyday.</p>
<p>American politics has always been passionate, messy, and (sometimes) violent.  We used to have actual duels where politicians shot it out, like Burr and Hamilton.</p>
<p>Frankly, I don&#8217;t see &#8220;hatred everywhere you look&#8221; in today&#8217;s politics.  Not at all.  I see voters shouting at politicians to obey their masters&#8211;the voters who put them in office.  But there is LESS racial hated, and LESS religious animosity, than at any prior time in U.S. history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdspringy</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/were-number-3/comment-page-2#comment-65957</link>
		<dc:creator>sdspringy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=12816#comment-65957</guid>
		<description>Nwahs, when troops are in combat a sign expressing support is preferrable to the leader of the Senate stating that they can&#039;t win.  That the war is lost.  Would you consider that ignorant, or just bad manners.
And I repeat, your hope and change is being blocked by Dems not Reps.
Also Rep. are half the country, you should try being more bipartisan and change some of your views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nwahs, when troops are in combat a sign expressing support is preferrable to the leader of the Senate stating that they can&#8217;t win.  That the war is lost.  Would you consider that ignorant, or just bad manners.<br />
And I repeat, your hope and change is being blocked by Dems not Reps.<br />
Also Rep. are half the country, you should try being more bipartisan and change some of your views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EscapeVelocity</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/were-number-3/comment-page-2#comment-65937</link>
		<dc:creator>EscapeVelocity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=12816#comment-65937</guid>
		<description>I understand what you are saying nwahs, but unfortunately, the Democrats are so bad, that that is all they have to do to win.  

How do you beat an America and Western Civilization Hating Leftwinger?

We need a Democrat Party that isnt controlled by Radical New Leftists.   We need that desperately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand what you are saying nwahs, but unfortunately, the Democrats are so bad, that that is all they have to do to win.  </p>
<p>How do you beat an America and Western Civilization Hating Leftwinger?</p>
<p>We need a Democrat Party that isnt controlled by Radical New Leftists.   We need that desperately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nwahs</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/were-number-3/comment-page-2#comment-65924</link>
		<dc:creator>nwahs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=12816#comment-65924</guid>
		<description>sdspringy&quot;Palin - not in office, not setting policy, and this is your biggest reason for hating the Reps. Read 1-4 above.&quot;

You forgot 
5: Appeal to ignorance. 

I resent that there is a feeling in the Republican party that all you have to do is hold a &quot;Support out troops&quot; sign and wear a  &quot;family values&quot; pin to get elected.  Its getting old having Republicans claim they are morally superior to half the country. I know I&#039;ve about had my fill of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sdspringy&#8221;Palin &#8211; not in office, not setting policy, and this is your biggest reason for hating the Reps. Read 1-4 above.&#8221;</p>
<p>You forgot<br />
5: Appeal to ignorance. </p>
<p>I resent that there is a feeling in the Republican party that all you have to do is hold a &#8220;Support out troops&#8221; sign and wear a  &#8220;family values&#8221; pin to get elected.  Its getting old having Republicans claim they are morally superior to half the country. I know I&#8217;ve about had my fill of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdspringy</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/were-number-3/comment-page-2#comment-65917</link>
		<dc:creator>sdspringy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=12816#comment-65917</guid>
		<description>Well Annie IDK whether you are a &quot;real American&quot; but it certainly sounds like you are a only child.   Because you can&#039;t have a public option and a solution to the deficit.  And the failing situation in Afghan is impossible now that Obama is in office.  The Dems say it’s the necessary war, Obama had a new strategy in Mar, and how could it be failing? 

One additional piece of reality for you, Annie, the Rep don&#039;t have to votes to stop anything.  So if the Public Option isn&#039;t passing it&#039;s the Dems that are stopping it.  So your criticisms are completely off the mark on health care.  Besides the Dems, there are a majority of &quot;other Americans&quot; who dislike the public option as well.  

So lets do alittle reality wrap up:  
Afghan - Necessary War,  Dems pull out now, terrorist proclaim victory, you own that in 2010 &amp; 2012
Public Option - Kills the budget, balloons the deficit, no way you can have both
Health Care - Reps don&#039;t have the votes, Dems can&#039;t convince enough of your own party to pass it.
Cap&amp;Trade - Reps don&#039;t have the votes, Dems could but won&#039;t pass it.
Palin - not in office, not setting policy, and this is your biggest reason for hating the Reps.  Read 1-4 above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Annie IDK whether you are a &#8220;real American&#8221; but it certainly sounds like you are a only child.   Because you can&#8217;t have a public option and a solution to the deficit.  And the failing situation in Afghan is impossible now that Obama is in office.  The Dems say it’s the necessary war, Obama had a new strategy in Mar, and how could it be failing? </p>
<p>One additional piece of reality for you, Annie, the Rep don&#8217;t have to votes to stop anything.  So if the Public Option isn&#8217;t passing it&#8217;s the Dems that are stopping it.  So your criticisms are completely off the mark on health care.  Besides the Dems, there are a majority of &#8220;other Americans&#8221; who dislike the public option as well.  </p>
<p>So lets do alittle reality wrap up:<br />
Afghan &#8211; Necessary War,  Dems pull out now, terrorist proclaim victory, you own that in 2010 &amp; 2012<br />
Public Option &#8211; Kills the budget, balloons the deficit, no way you can have both<br />
Health Care &#8211; Reps don&#8217;t have the votes, Dems can&#8217;t convince enough of your own party to pass it.<br />
Cap&amp;Trade &#8211; Reps don&#8217;t have the votes, Dems could but won&#8217;t pass it.<br />
Palin &#8211; not in office, not setting policy, and this is your biggest reason for hating the Reps.  Read 1-4 above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

