stay connected

FrumForum Facebook FrumForum YouTube Update Twitter FrumForum Flickr

The Rpvs Slide Into Irrelevance?

February 18th, 2009 at 9:43 pm by John Gardner | 5 Comments |

The Republican Party of Virginia has just sent out a stem-winder of a fundraising email, which is reproduced below (The subject line was “Stop the Democrats and their Union cronies”):


 

But I’m not attaching it as a request for contributions. If this is the best approach RPV has, we’re in for a long Republican drought in the Old Dominion. Here’s why:

First, whatever anyone thinks about the stimulus package, the idea that tax cuts lead to new debt – and there are significant amounts of tax reductions in the law, not least the AMT fix – is, I thought, a Democrat idea, not a Republican one. And there’s a difference between $787 billion and $1 trillion. Hyperbole has its place, but 22 percent is over the line.

Second, the letter refers to a figure of 600,000 government jobs from the stimulus package. I assume it comes from the President-Elect’s careless remarks in his January 3 radio address about 3,000,000 new jobs, 80 percent of which would be in the private sector. I’m all for reminding the voters of bad quotes and flip-flops, but connecting this with “infrastructure projects” – the quotes here are RPV’s, not mine – is just not smart politics here.   Why is “creating a million new” jobs, even if many are held by union members, a bad idea? I think I would rather be Tim Kaine or Jim Webb at a transportation project ground-breaking in 2009 or a ribbon-cutting in 2011 than to be a Republican who voted against transportation at either the Federal or Virginia level.   And of course transportation projects are “PAID FOR BY YOU” – where’s the scandal there? How else do Republicans propose to get these done? Bond issues are “PAID FOR BY YOU,” too. 

Next, the letter claims that President Obama wants to abolish right-to-work laws. If he in fact endorsed last year’s HR 6477, I’m not aware of it. Some evidence here would have been helpful and made the argument more compelling.

But the pièce de resistance comes when discussing a Democratic fundraising dinner and a protest outside a hotel, which all three Democratic candidates for Governor joined. Of all the media outlets to cite, RPV chose the People’s Weekly World.

Quoting the Communist Party newspaper? In Virginia?   In 2009?   Are RPV contributions being used for a subscription? Sure, people joke about living in the “People’s Republic of Alexandria,” but please. If they insist on going down this tired, even childish path, at least RPV could have made a nod in the direction of new media (and humor) by perhaps linking to Mikhalkov and Alexandrov’s stirring “Hymn of the Soviet Union”  (Warning: the devil has better music, and this one will stick in your head for a while.)   Or is this just RPV cadres’ late-night fantasizing about imposing democratic centralism on those fractious northern Virginians who might – gasp – actually want to impose smoking restrictions in restaurants?

Right to work is a very important issue in Virginia and has undoubtedly helped the state’s economy grow. But there are better ways to defend it than to raise the spectre of Communism. The economy’s bad, but it’s not quite 1848 yet.

Instead, how about some quotations from Tim Kaine or Jim Webb or the gubernatorial candidates? Or from one of those “union bosses” actually targeting Virginia?   Or even “Jim Webb and Mark Warner refused to rule out voting to abolish Virginia’s right-to-work laws” (if they try and fail to get statements to that effect)?

Bob McDonnell, the Republican candidate for Governor, is a smart and serious guy who has served well as Attorney General. While the fundraising letter is admittedly a unique genre, this one would probably make him wince.

What do we stand for, rather than just standing against? What are our new ideas for the Commonwealth?

Otherwise, we’re just seen to rail in opposition. Even if it brings in some money, what does this letter convey about the Republican brand?

For this letter, people may just click “Delete.” A couple more like this, and people may start to click “Spam.”

Recent Posts by John Gardner



5 responses so far

  • 1 Bulldoglover100 // Feb 19, 2009 at 9:24 am

    THANK YOU….this is what so many of us want and are growing weary of asking the GOP to provide. We want answers and help in fixing the problems in this country. The days of Karl Rove lies and twisting of the facts are over. The internet has made that “GOP tool” obsolete. People can, and do, checks facts these days all the time and when we get caught lying or twisting the facts? We get caught and lose votes.

  • 2 gerrysh // Feb 19, 2009 at 10:57 am

    The days of believing that the troll has anything to do with the GOP never were.

  • 3 bloodstar // Feb 19, 2009 at 3:14 pm

    Maybe if we’re lucky we’ll find a way to take the Libertarian Party to a nice Center right position and send the Republican Party into the dust heap of history. I say this in frustration at the continued death spiral of the Republican Party as they continue down the path of culling the impure.

    It’s a pity there are so many laws entrenching the major parties in place, otherwise I’m sure you’d see a much more serious effort to generate some sort of replacement for the Republican party underway.

  • 4 sinz54 // Feb 20, 2009 at 8:50 am

    The GOP is going to lose the so-called “Reagan Democrats” of Ohio, Michigan and Pennsylvania, if the GOP keeps up this union-bashing. (And without those three states, the GOP cannot get enough electoral votes from the Red States to elect a President.) The Dems have trapped the GOP: After the Dems raised the specter of “card-check” (even if it’s a bluff), the GOP responded reflexively with red-meat union-bashing rhetoric reminiscent of the 1940s. Those “Reagan Democrats” are mostly blue-collar working-class people, many of them union members. These folks typically have two bumper stickers on their trucks: “Proud to be American” and “Union YES!” It’s one thing for the GOP to uphold the principle of the secret ballot. But when the GOP implies that unionizing is something that the Communist Party would favor, or calls union members “thugs” (as I’ve seen on other conservative blogs), they are driving all blue-collar working-class people into the arms of the Dem Party. Did it ever occur to the GOP that by insinuating that unionizing is Communist or thuggish, they just insulted every patriotic union member in America?

  • 5 sinz54 // Feb 20, 2009 at 8:57 am

    bloodstar: The main laws that entrench the two existing parties are the laws in most states that mandate “winner take all” of that state’s electoral votes, even if no candidate receives a majority of that state’s popular vote. As a result, a third party typically gets zero electoral votes, even if it wins a sizable percentage of the popular vote. (That’s what happened with Ross Perot’s third-party candidacy in 1992. He won 19% of the popular vote–not bad for a fledgling third party–but ZERO electoral votes.) If electoral votes were awarded proportionally in each state, it would then be possible for a third party to win enough electoral votes to deny either major party candidate a majority. Then those candidates would have a good reason to negotiate with the third party, giving it real leverage and visibility. So if you really want to give third parties a chance, start a movement in your own state to change how it awards electoral votes.

You must log in to post a comment.