Since you obviously are not capable of reading, please ask your caretaker to explain the links below to you.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/11/us/11shoot.html (James von Brunn)

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/11/us/11shoot.html (Scott Roeder)

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/20/national/20oklahoma.html (Timothy McVeigh)

The last one killed more people than all the “Leftist” terrorist of the 60s and 70s combined.

The “anger” of conservatives today is entirely peaceful and largely middle-class, and seeks to reverse the Leftward drift of the country being engineered by the very same 1960s-1970s Leftist radicals who have since come to hold political power.

How is the comparison remotely comparable?

I saw the pics of the DC rally and it struck me as primarily “mature” but as Balc notes an inchoherent message – timing of the rallies precludes them from being an issue of taxation.

I find this interesting, since the overall conservative principles of limited government, fiscal prudence, and honest morality are not being attacked; rather, the conservative movement is charged with abadoning its own beliefs in exchange for political expediency.

I read these passages:
“Furthermore, this movement should be about more than just getting Republicans or Conservatives elected to office. It needs (like the Left did) to focus on Institution Infiltration and Coercion….this goes for any institution….corporate, environmentalist groups, government. After acquiring employment within the institution, any power acquired should be used to promote political ideology and fellow travellers.”

and it makes me weary- this is the stuff of college sophomores wanting to play Che Guevara/ V.I. Lenin. It is all about gaining power, destroying enemies, and nothing about winning arguments or attracting converts to a belief. Hell, it isn’t about beliefs at all- it is all fury and rage without an underlying belief.
Sarah Palin is the product of this movement- no ideas or principles, but pure identity politics and class hatred.

The motivation for much of the anti-war activists in the 1960’s wasn’t really pacifism … but not wanting to have their ass shipped over to Vietnam.

Similarly, the motivation for a lot of teaparty marchers isn’t really an ideology of pushing back against big government … but pure anti-taxism (thus the name “teabag”, and their initial rallies coinciding with April 15th last spring). If it was really a coherent ideology, we’d have seen the same people marching years ago as Bush expanded government.

But anti-taxism only goes so far … particularly since most of the rally-goers aren’t going to see significant if any tax increases. So they need the “against” talking points to keep them cohesive.

The 60s protesters werent just anti Vietnam War, they were pro Socialist/Communist…however that had to be downplayed for obvious reasons.

But what the TEA party protesters share with the youthful protesters of the 1960s is raw anger and negativity. Those antiwar protesters wanted America to bug out of Vietnam. What would happen afterward in the world, they just didn’t care. The “boat people” disaster, they’re partly responsible for.

Likewise, these TEA Party protesters are animated more by what they’re against (Obama’s entire domestic agenda) than what they’re in favor of.

And as with the 1960s protesters, just cutting and running from the issue, whether it’s Vietnam or health care, won’t work. The issue will still be there, whether our government faces up to it or not.

You can read Michelle Malkin’s blog day after day, and never find one positive proposal for the nation. It’s all AGAINST–against ACORN, against immigrants, against Obama, against liberals.

So the appeal of these protesters will always be limited, until they can explain to the rest of the nation what their positive vision of the nation is.

“Happy Days Are Here Again” has always worked much better than “Stop the POTUS Before He Destroys the Nation.”

Furthermore, the base is motivated and Democrats through the sheer act of ruling will drive away coalition members that voted for them, in recent elections as they feel betrayed, ingnored, or otherwise dissillusioned in Hopey Changiness.

Sarah Palin is a nice young fresh face, we also need to get the College Republicans active and out there.

Duplicating the New Lefts successful strategies and tactics is a fantastic idea. One reason it is so successful is that New Left Radicals have places to go with their radical political ideas that pays a good wage, to pursue those ideas. They have developed a net of support, awards ceremonies, carreer opportunities which support their politics and political goals.

Furthermore, this movement should be about more than just getting Republicans or Conservatives elected to office. It needs (like the Left did) to focus on Institution Infiltration and Coercion….this goes for any institution….corporate, environmentalist groups, government. After acquiring employment within the institution, any power acquired should be used to promote political ideology and fellow travellers. This is long established by teh Left as a tactic. You get ahead by mouthing Politically Correct doctrine, because they have taken over the hen house and clubbed, sued, threatened, insitutions into moving away from unprofitable conflict with these ideologues.

We need to be thinking deeper than just winning elections.

Finally, Conservatives/Republicans caught on that they couldnt just keep appointing middle of the road judges….because the Left had targeted judicial appointments in their strategy to promote their agenda, of subversion of the Constitution, law, and legislatures….and promotion of a Leftwing Agenda.

Its time to get serious with these folks. They have tenure at Universities (our Think Tanks were a response to that and other Leftwing organization which was a good start), and sit around in Fill in the Blank Studies Departments, English, Humanities, and Anthropology, Sociology, and Psychology departments thinking up ways of undermining and waging war against, infiltrating Western Civilization.

Lost my train of thought, distracted.