The Death of the Grown-Up

February 19th, 2009 at 11:21 pm David Frum | No Comments |

| Print

In The Death of the Grown-Up, Washington Times columnist Diana West has produced an ambitious, sophisticated, and closely argued case that the ills of American culture can be traced to a society-wide revulsion from the obligations and responsibilities of adulthood. The thesis has been heard before – it was something of a staple of the industry of high-brow cultural critique that flourished from about 1945 until about 1965 – but Diana comes to it with fresh evidence and fresh urgency.

At a time when conservative authors often seek only to entertain, agitate or gratify their readers, Diana challenges them. Just as its thesis is a little old-fashioned, so too is the book’s tone and style: It takes us back to the days when authors believed that books could be grand and sweeping and still find an audience. Despite her gloom about American maturity, Diana has gambled her book on a faith that there still exist readers who do not flinch from uncomfortable truths, delivered in a style that concedes not an inch to the attention deficits of contemporary readers.

The Death of the Grown-Up covers a lot of ground and provokes a lot of thought. My own thoughts, once provoked, did not always agree with the author’s, especially in her sections on foreign policy. She might have done better to reserve those for a second book, rather than trying to shoe-horn them into an argument where they did not very well fit. But that’s just my reaction. Each reader will have his or her own to this forceful, intelligent, and impressive first book.

Latest Book Reviews



4 Comments so far ↓

  • Johnnnymac66

    I’ve lived all of my 51 years in Chicago. I learned world politics by reading Gigi Geyer, Evans & Novak, George Will, and many, many others. I learned Chicago politics by reading Mike Royko, Studs Terkel, and many others.
    For me, the tipping point with Evans came when he “outted” Valerie Plame, a crime I believe was treasonous. I wrote him and told him exactly that, and was not surprised when I received no response.
    From that point on, I’d glance at his columns, but never again believed anything in them.
    When Hunter Thompson would inject himself into the stories he was writing, it was funny. Outting an undercover CIA operative because of a personal grudge wasn’t at all funny.
    I still believe Robert Evans committed treason against the United States.

  • WaStateUrbanGOPer

    Novak comes off as a sort of American, Jewish-cum-Catholic verson of Evelyn Waugh: nasty, vindictive and palpably self loathing. But he wasn’t unpatriotic. Moreover, he was correct about the War on Terror and Iraq. Compare his foreign policy views to David Frum’s, and then tell me: who comes out looking better on the geopolitics of the past decade?

  • WaStateUrbanGOPer

    Oh, and by the way Frum, you’d fail your mother-in-law’s course, too: it’s ABC 20/20, not “NBC 20/20.”

  • lolapowers

    Mr Frum, I so wholeheartedly agree with you, Novak was indeed a dark soul !

Leave a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.