<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Support New Credit Union Regs Despite Barney Frank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frumforum.com/support-new-credit-union-regs-despite-barney-frank/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frumforum.com/support-new-credit-union-regs-despite-barney-frank</link>
	<description>Building a conservatism that can win again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:50:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oskar</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/support-new-credit-union-regs-despite-barney-frank/comment-page-1#comment-93104</link>
		<dc:creator>Oskar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 19:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=27225#comment-93104</guid>
		<description>Barney Frank is a tool of capitalism the same as all Democrats and Republicans. The stupid partisan bickering is a smoke screen designed to divert attention from the fact that international bankers and war profiteers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barney Frank is a tool of capitalism the same as all Democrats and Republicans. The stupid partisan bickering is a smoke screen designed to divert attention from the fact that international bankers and war profiteers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sinz54</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/support-new-credit-union-regs-despite-barney-frank/comment-page-1#comment-93079</link>
		<dc:creator>sinz54</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 18:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=27225#comment-93079</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; The general Republican opposition to the bill stems from the banks’ dislike of it.  Banks are big business and, for obvious reasons, traditionally a Republican constituency. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
This is what I was talking about.

We expect most of the Dems to be protecting various interest groups (like the unionized auto industry), because they&#039;ve always advocated industrial policy.  At least they&#039;re consistent.  But it&#039;s wrong for the GOP to claim they&#039;re for competition--and then move to protect big business from competition.

Agribusiness, another traditionally GOP constituency, is the only reason that crop-based ethanol exists as a fuel additive for your car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The general Republican opposition to the bill stems from the banks’ dislike of it.  Banks are big business and, for obvious reasons, traditionally a Republican constituency.<br />
This is what I was talking about.</p>
<p>We expect most of the Dems to be protecting various interest groups (like the unionized auto industry), because they&#8217;ve always advocated industrial policy.  At least they&#8217;re consistent.  But it&#8217;s wrong for the GOP to claim they&#8217;re for competition&#8211;and then move to protect big business from competition.</p>
<p>Agribusiness, another traditionally GOP constituency, is the only reason that crop-based ethanol exists as a fuel additive for your car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: COProgressive</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/support-new-credit-union-regs-despite-barney-frank/comment-page-1#comment-93075</link>
		<dc:creator>COProgressive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=27225#comment-93075</guid>
		<description>eli wrote;
&quot;The measure, the felicitously named “Promoting Lending to America’s Small Business Act” is a modest proposal that would make it easier for credit unions (highly regulated, member-controlled, non-profit lending institutions) to lend money to businesses that belong to them.



&quot;The general Republican opposition to the bill stems from the banks’ dislike of it.  Banks are big business and, for obvious reasons, traditionally a Republican constituency.&quot;

This is the crux of the problem in our country and our economy today.  Big business, of all sorts, wish to get larger and more difficult to control (regulate) with the help of the power they wheel at the expense of those over whom they wheel that power.  As we&#039;ve seen in the events of the last 18 months, bigger isn&#039;t always better.  We need to stop encouraging the growth of the power of big business at the expense of everyone else.  If the best and brightest are running our big businesses they should need no help from our government.  But on the other hand, we, our government, should be easing the way for all who wish to compete to have that opportunity to suceed and grow without our government&#039;s hinderance at the direction of big business.  After all, our government was formed for &quot;We the People&quot;, not &quot;We the Multinational Corporations of the world&quot;. 

We are an innovative nation of people looking to improve their lots in life through hard work and to do so sometimes need the help (financing) of a bank.  It&#039;s the grass roots local banks and Credit Unions that have the face-to-face relationships with their customers and have a true business interest in seeing them succeed.  We, as a nation, need to start supporting American prosperity from the ground up, from Main Street up to Wall Street, not the other way round.  Pouring money in at the top, hoping it will &quot;Trickle Down&quot; has been shown to be a recipe for failure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eli wrote;<br />
&#8220;The measure, the felicitously named “Promoting Lending to America’s Small Business Act” is a modest proposal that would make it easier for credit unions (highly regulated, member-controlled, non-profit lending institutions) to lend money to businesses that belong to them.</p>
<p>&#8220;The general Republican opposition to the bill stems from the banks’ dislike of it.  Banks are big business and, for obvious reasons, traditionally a Republican constituency.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is the crux of the problem in our country and our economy today.  Big business, of all sorts, wish to get larger and more difficult to control (regulate) with the help of the power they wheel at the expense of those over whom they wheel that power.  As we&#8217;ve seen in the events of the last 18 months, bigger isn&#8217;t always better.  We need to stop encouraging the growth of the power of big business at the expense of everyone else.  If the best and brightest are running our big businesses they should need no help from our government.  But on the other hand, we, our government, should be easing the way for all who wish to compete to have that opportunity to suceed and grow without our government&#8217;s hinderance at the direction of big business.  After all, our government was formed for &#8220;We the People&#8221;, not &#8220;We the Multinational Corporations of the world&#8221;. </p>
<p>We are an innovative nation of people looking to improve their lots in life through hard work and to do so sometimes need the help (financing) of a bank.  It&#8217;s the grass roots local banks and Credit Unions that have the face-to-face relationships with their customers and have a true business interest in seeing them succeed.  We, as a nation, need to start supporting American prosperity from the ground up, from Main Street up to Wall Street, not the other way round.  Pouring money in at the top, hoping it will &#8220;Trickle Down&#8221; has been shown to be a recipe for failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LFC</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/support-new-credit-union-regs-despite-barney-frank/comment-page-1#comment-93065</link>
		<dc:creator>LFC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=27225#comment-93065</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;A recent debate over a business lending measure, however, makes it clear that many Republicans put other values above the free market.&lt;/i&gt;

For Republicans, &quot;free market&quot; is nothing more than a campaign slogan.  When one of their donors feels that their profitability is threatened, they&#039;ll roll (bend?) over in a New York minute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent debate over a business lending measure, however, makes it clear that many Republicans put other values above the free market.</p>
<p>For Republicans, &#8220;free market&#8221; is nothing more than a campaign slogan.  When one of their donors feels that their profitability is threatened, they&#8217;ll roll (bend?) over in a New York minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob_654</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/support-new-credit-union-regs-despite-barney-frank/comment-page-1#comment-93064</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob_654</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=27225#comment-93064</guid>
		<description>Another clear example of the Democrats fighting for the &quot;little guy&quot; while the Republicans fight to protect the wealth of the powerful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another clear example of the Democrats fighting for the &#8220;little guy&#8221; while the Republicans fight to protect the wealth of the powerful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bebe99</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/support-new-credit-union-regs-despite-barney-frank/comment-page-1#comment-93053</link>
		<dc:creator>Bebe99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=27225#comment-93053</guid>
		<description>&quot; If we are not for this, what are we for?&quot; 
Answer Corporate America, of course. 
Until our Congress is set free from the bonds of corporatations and lobbyists through campaign finance reform, Congresspersons can not act in the interests of anyone but themselves and their corporate sponsors. It is just logical, it is just human nature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; If we are not for this, what are we for?&#8221;<br />
Answer Corporate America, of course.<br />
Until our Congress is set free from the bonds of corporatations and lobbyists through campaign finance reform, Congresspersons can not act in the interests of anyone but themselves and their corporate sponsors. It is just logical, it is just human nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FormerConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/support-new-credit-union-regs-despite-barney-frank/comment-page-1#comment-93041</link>
		<dc:creator>FormerConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=27225#comment-93041</guid>
		<description>Yet another perfect example of why so many actual &quot;c&quot;onservatives have left the Republican party.  Go Dog Go said it best:  If we are not for this, what are we for?    Bueller? Bueller….?

One of the reasons that Rove was able to help Bush win, is that he cleverly found wedge issues that would divide his opponents base.  The Republican base is now being divided into factions.  One group  believes they can win simply by opposing Democrats and calling them names (Tea Party?) and those that actually care about applying conservative principles to governing.  You know, like so many of the lost, confused and increasingly abandoned people that hang out here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another perfect example of why so many actual &#8220;c&#8221;onservatives have left the Republican party.  Go Dog Go said it best:  If we are not for this, what are we for?    Bueller? Bueller….?</p>
<p>One of the reasons that Rove was able to help Bush win, is that he cleverly found wedge issues that would divide his opponents base.  The Republican base is now being divided into factions.  One group  believes they can win simply by opposing Democrats and calling them names (Tea Party?) and those that actually care about applying conservative principles to governing.  You know, like so many of the lost, confused and increasingly abandoned people that hang out here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ottovbvs</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/support-new-credit-union-regs-despite-barney-frank/comment-page-1#comment-93023</link>
		<dc:creator>ottovbvs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=27225#comment-93023</guid>
		<description>.....the invocation of Frank is a telling example of the Republican propensity for elevating personality over policy.......they think it&#039;s more important that Palin is Palin than that she should be a competent candidate with underpinnings of knowledge and judgement.......at the end of the day this is about effective governance in the public good.....the problem Mr Lehrer is that this has long ceased to be a Republican priority</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;..the invocation of Frank is a telling example of the Republican propensity for elevating personality over policy&#8230;&#8230;.they think it&#8217;s more important that Palin is Palin than that she should be a competent candidate with underpinnings of knowledge and judgement&#8230;&#8230;.at the end of the day this is about effective governance in the public good&#8230;..the problem Mr Lehrer is that this has long ceased to be a Republican priority</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cporet</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/support-new-credit-union-regs-despite-barney-frank/comment-page-1#comment-93002</link>
		<dc:creator>cporet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=27225#comment-93002</guid>
		<description>I predict not a single yea vote by Republicans in either the committee, the House, or the Senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I predict not a single yea vote by Republicans in either the committee, the House, or the Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Far Center &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A small step in the right direction</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/support-new-credit-union-regs-despite-barney-frank/comment-page-1#comment-92993</link>
		<dc:creator>Far Center &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A small step in the right direction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=27225#comment-92993</guid>
		<description>[...] there are a few things that have &lt;some&gt; bipartisan support. This article about easing lending restrictions for credit unions is one of those rare instances where not only [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there are a few things that have &lt;some&gt; bipartisan support. This article about easing lending restrictions for credit unions is one of those rare instances where not only [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

