<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Striking a Tea Party Balance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frumforum.com/striking-a-tea-party-balance/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frumforum.com/striking-a-tea-party-balance</link>
	<description>Building a conservatism that can win again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:50:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fairy Hardcastle</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/striking-a-tea-party-balance/comment-page-1#comment-146046</link>
		<dc:creator>Fairy Hardcastle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=39178#comment-146046</guid>
		<description>JimBob, good point on pro-life.  Boola, you are clearly wrong.  The ultimate expression of a too-powerful government is the depersonalization of humans.  Thus libertarian thought must be against any government attempt to depersonalize a human being.  Abortion depersonalizes an unborn boy or girl who has a natural right to life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JimBob, good point on pro-life.  Boola, you are clearly wrong.  The ultimate expression of a too-powerful government is the depersonalization of humans.  Thus libertarian thought must be against any government attempt to depersonalize a human being.  Abortion depersonalizes an unborn boy or girl who has a natural right to life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimBob</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/striking-a-tea-party-balance/comment-page-1#comment-133764</link>
		<dc:creator>JimBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=39178#comment-133764</guid>
		<description>bottoms, government spending doesn&#039;t create growth or wealth.     How many times throughout history do these so called top economist have to be proven wrong before people realize they don&#039;t know what they&#039;re talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bottoms, government spending doesn&#8217;t create growth or wealth.     How many times throughout history do these so called top economist have to be proven wrong before people realize they don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimBob</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/striking-a-tea-party-balance/comment-page-1#comment-133763</link>
		<dc:creator>JimBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=39178#comment-133763</guid>
		<description>Boola, I guess you&#039;re not that up to date on libertarianism   

http://www.l4l.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boola, I guess you&#8217;re not that up to date on libertarianism   </p>
<p><a href="http://www.l4l.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.l4l.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbottoms</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/striking-a-tea-party-balance/comment-page-1#comment-133695</link>
		<dc:creator>rbottoms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 01:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=39178#comment-133695</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
There is nothing “incoherent” about being a pro-choice fiscal conservative. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What&#039;s incoherent is being a pro-choice fiscal conservative who supports the GOP, home of religious zealots and anti-intellectual nuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing “incoherent” about being a pro-choice fiscal conservative. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s incoherent is being a pro-choice fiscal conservative who supports the GOP, home of religious zealots and anti-intellectual nuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbottoms</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/striking-a-tea-party-balance/comment-page-1#comment-133694</link>
		<dc:creator>rbottoms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 01:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=39178#comment-133694</guid>
		<description>Tough crowd for a message of economic common sense, especially if your leaders make not having any a badge of honor.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
   &lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/01/boehner-anti-intellectualism/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; WALLACE: Congressman — a number of top economists say what we need is more economic stimulus.

    BOEHNER: Well, I don’t need to see GDP numbers or to listen to economists. All I need to do is listen to the American people, because they’ve been asking the question now for 18 months, “where are the jobs?”&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The Democrats biggest hope in November is the the GOP will continue to try to out-crazy each other in order to kiss teabagger ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tough crowd for a message of economic common sense, especially if your leaders make not having any a badge of honor.</p>
<p>    WALLACE: Congressman — a number of top economists say what we need is more economic stimulus.</p>
<p>    BOEHNER: Well, I don’t need to see GDP numbers or to listen to economists. All I need to do is listen to the American people, because they’ve been asking the question now for 18 months, “where are the jobs?”</p>
<p>The Democrats biggest hope in November is the the GOP will continue to try to out-crazy each other in order to kiss teabagger ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sinz54</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/striking-a-tea-party-balance/comment-page-1#comment-133318</link>
		<dc:creator>sinz54</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=39178#comment-133318</guid>
		<description>Mr. Holt,

There is nothing &quot;incoherent&quot; about being a pro-choice fiscal conservative.  

It can easily be defended on the grounds that the government shouldn&#039;t be running either your business or your bedroom.  Provided that one also accepts that a first-trimester fetus&#039;s brain hasn&#039;t yet developed to the point that it can be considered a person capable of intellectual thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Holt,</p>
<p>There is nothing &#8220;incoherent&#8221; about being a pro-choice fiscal conservative.  </p>
<p>It can easily be defended on the grounds that the government shouldn&#8217;t be running either your business or your bedroom.  Provided that one also accepts that a first-trimester fetus&#8217;s brain hasn&#8217;t yet developed to the point that it can be considered a person capable of intellectual thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoolaBoola</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/striking-a-tea-party-balance/comment-page-1#comment-133101</link>
		<dc:creator>BoolaBoola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 03:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=39178#comment-133101</guid>
		<description>Ron Paul is a right-to-lifer.  That means he is by definition not libertarian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul is a right-to-lifer.  That means he is by definition not libertarian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimBob</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/striking-a-tea-party-balance/comment-page-1#comment-133080</link>
		<dc:creator>JimBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 01:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=39178#comment-133080</guid>
		<description>Ron Paul does not favor open borders and he&#039;s certainly not an isolationist.   Not supporting NeoCon wars in the Middle East is hardly isolationism.   The real isolationist are those that support economic sanctions and blockades.  Cuba a small country 90 miles from the United States and we don&#039;t trade with them.    

Ron Paul&#039;s message of limited government  peace, commerce,  and friendship has broad appeal that crosses party lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul does not favor open borders and he&#8217;s certainly not an isolationist.   Not supporting NeoCon wars in the Middle East is hardly isolationism.   The real isolationist are those that support economic sanctions and blockades.  Cuba a small country 90 miles from the United States and we don&#8217;t trade with them.    </p>
<p>Ron Paul&#8217;s message of limited government  peace, commerce,  and friendship has broad appeal that crosses party lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SkepticalIdealist</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/striking-a-tea-party-balance/comment-page-1#comment-133063</link>
		<dc:creator>SkepticalIdealist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 01:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=39178#comment-133063</guid>
		<description>To write off Bush as if he weren&#039;t a Fiscal Conservative is typical, but fundamentally dishonest. Reagan left us with about a 200 billion dollar deficit, and Bush Sr. made it worse with a 300 dollar deficit. Clinton came into office and his advisors basically told him that he wouldn&#039;t be able to invest in education, healthcare, and infrastructure like he promised on the campaign. All that had to put on the back burner because Clinton, the so called tax-and-spend liberal, had to take care of the deficit. He did exactly that, he left this country with a large surplus. Bush comes into office and he leaves the economy in a worse condition than it&#039;s been since the 1930&#039;s. The champion of fiscal conservatism left us with a trillion dollar deficit. 

That&#039;s not an accident. It&#039;s by design. Conservatives do that on purpose, so when the Democrats get into power they can fear monger about the deficit and prevent them from helping the working class. Why? Because that sometimes results in growing the size of government. And that is unacceptable, no matter what the result may be. For liberals the ends of helping the poor justifies the means. For conservatives, it is the means of small government that justifies any ends. Even the destruction of middle class America. 

Again, this is the deficit created by the right-wing movement that elected right-wing politicians. So riddle me this, why is it that we can pay off military contractors, give the wealthiest Americans massive tax cuts, abolish the capital gains and the estate tax, and put that ALL on our tab - yet when it comes time to invest in every day working Americans, that is the time conservatives choose to scream about the deficit? 

A Fiscal Conservative is someone who cuts taxes, increases spending, and leaves us with a massive deficit. All I know is I&#039;m voting for a tax-and-spend liberal because they seem to be the only ones who know how to balance a freakin budget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To write off Bush as if he weren&#8217;t a Fiscal Conservative is typical, but fundamentally dishonest. Reagan left us with about a 200 billion dollar deficit, and Bush Sr. made it worse with a 300 dollar deficit. Clinton came into office and his advisors basically told him that he wouldn&#8217;t be able to invest in education, healthcare, and infrastructure like he promised on the campaign. All that had to put on the back burner because Clinton, the so called tax-and-spend liberal, had to take care of the deficit. He did exactly that, he left this country with a large surplus. Bush comes into office and he leaves the economy in a worse condition than it&#8217;s been since the 1930&#8217;s. The champion of fiscal conservatism left us with a trillion dollar deficit. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s not an accident. It&#8217;s by design. Conservatives do that on purpose, so when the Democrats get into power they can fear monger about the deficit and prevent them from helping the working class. Why? Because that sometimes results in growing the size of government. And that is unacceptable, no matter what the result may be. For liberals the ends of helping the poor justifies the means. For conservatives, it is the means of small government that justifies any ends. Even the destruction of middle class America. </p>
<p>Again, this is the deficit created by the right-wing movement that elected right-wing politicians. So riddle me this, why is it that we can pay off military contractors, give the wealthiest Americans massive tax cuts, abolish the capital gains and the estate tax, and put that ALL on our tab &#8211; yet when it comes time to invest in every day working Americans, that is the time conservatives choose to scream about the deficit? </p>
<p>A Fiscal Conservative is someone who cuts taxes, increases spending, and leaves us with a massive deficit. All I know is I&#8217;m voting for a tax-and-spend liberal because they seem to be the only ones who know how to balance a freakin budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Striking a Tea Party Balance &#124; FrumForum &#124; The Daily Conservative</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/striking-a-tea-party-balance/comment-page-1#comment-133058</link>
		<dc:creator>Striking a Tea Party Balance &#124; FrumForum &#124; The Daily Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 01:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=39178#comment-133058</guid>
		<description>[...] the rest here: Striking a Tea Party Balance &#124; FrumForum   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the rest here: Striking a Tea Party Balance | FrumForum   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

