I differ, however, with you that evolution, which is a science and proven fact, should be treated in the same classroom with ID or any religious belief.

—-

Evolution is science, so is ID. ID is not a religious belief anymore than Evolution is.

However ID is not as developed a paradigm as Evolution and should not be given equal treatment in the classroom or cirricula, IMO. It should be discussed within the Evolution cirricula. The controversy itself is a excellent teaching tool, for kids to understand what science is and is not….the assumptions of science, and its limitations. Catching kids attention and interest as well, instead of nodding off in biology class.

We disagree, no need to agree to disagree. We just simply disagree.

Special rights refer to laws granting rights to one or more groups which are not extended to other groups, such as affirmative action or hate crime legislation with regard to ethnic, religious or sexual minorities.

Protected class, identity groups.

Please deal with reality….oneon1

I find it fascinating that the Left always gets upset and uppity, when certain groups play the victim card. Those would be the groups that are not afforded PC protections, special rights. In a word those groups are the enemy of the coalition of identity groups, that the Left shepherds to undermine Western Civilization and demand racist sexist and other identity group special rights, priveleges, and dispensation.

In the UK for example, people in protected class identity groups are put ahead of indigenous whites when assigning Low Income Subsidized Housing.

The Left are racists, while claiming to be anti racist. What this reveals is that they in fact they are is anti Western.

Youve been exposed….but you havent the good sense to be ashamed. You are in fact proud of these achievements.

No one is promising anyone special rights. The money we spend on social safety nets extends to all citizens who meet the qualifying need. Individual programs that target specific populations of poor represent a fraction of our total GDP.

All of this is not part of some evil socialist scheme. It’s called trying to mitigate the sharper edges of capitalism which tends to pool money in the system. Social programs help maintain society by insuring against the problems caused by a large poor population. These are necessary to maintaining order.

Minorities vote for the Democrats/Left, because the D/L stoke their fears and greivances into a narrative that has racist Whitey oppressing them in Apartheid South Africa fashion, and only the Democrats/Left can protect them from that. And if that doesnt work, then we will promise you special rights, protections, preferences, over those evil WASPs. And if that doesnt work, we will redistribute wealth from those evil Caucasian Capitalist Imperialist Oppressors of Brown folks around the globe, they are ill gotten gains anyway.

Its easy to see the allure of that messege to dark skinned folks. But its damn ugly and vile. But we are talking about the Left. And so it goes.

How about military retirees receiving lifelong pensions (2/3 of base pay if you stay in 25 years) and gold plated medical benefits?

DFL: I think we’ve finally circled back around to your original statement, which was “They (blacks and hispanics) vote their pocketbooks and see the government as succor.” You’ve now increased your tent, backtracking and saying that anyone who sees a single government dollar tends to have a more positive view of government, and tends to lean Democratic.

Which if that were the case, you’d be swimming in a sea of make-believe socialism. Look, if you want argue against big government, fine. I’m with you 100% there. We need to reduce government spending, particularly in entitlements and military. But now you’re arguing that anyone who receives government dollars has a positive view of government and thus of the Democrats? That everyone in the military is probably Democrat? Every farmer? Every welfare recipient.

Like we said earlier in direct response to your utterly stereotypical remark (which you continue to press with “17 is 50% larger than 12″) the argument that minorities vote in large part based on government succor is false. But now you’re saying practically all of us should be Democrats?

Sarkozy Thinks Obama is ‘Incredibly Naive and Grossly Egotistical’

http://www.breitbart.tv/sources-sarkozy-thinks-obama-is-incredibly-naive-and-grossly-egotistical/