New York Governor David Paterson shot down rumors that he was planning to resign at a press conference Tuesday, hoping to quash a controversy that has consumed Albany for several days. “The only way I’m not going to be governor next year is at the ballot box,” Paterson told reporters. “And the only way I’ll be leaving office before is in a box.”
Paterson admitted sitting down with reporters from the New York Times, the paper rumored to have been working on a scandalous story that was to prompt Paterson’s resignation. The Governor was quick to add that the interview touched only on political and governing issues, not the topics “that have been the source of the mass speculation and feeding frenzy and circus that we have witnessed the last couple of weeks.”
Paterson deserves credit for his moxie if nothing else. He soldiers on in the face of dismal approval ratings, an obstinate if not wholly hostile state legislature, and even a Democratic White House that just wishes he would go away. This latest rumor about Paterson’s early exit only compounds the issue. The Governor himself openly mused about its source, and one can’t help but wonder if political enemies are trying to hasten his exit from the public stage.
It is ironic that Paterson’s only ally these days seems to be his one confirmed challenger for governor, Republican Rick Lazio. In an open letter to Times Executive Editor Bill Keller, Lazio called upon the Gray Lady to either confirm or deny whether it was working on the rumored story and bring an end to “over a week of innuendo and nasty speculation.”
Lazio’s letter provided an interesting twist to the unfolding drama, or tragedy, that has become David Paterson’s administration. The letter could be written off as a shrewd political move on Lazio’s part, but more likely it was a sincere statement about the depths to which politics and media have sunk. It surely stands in stark contrast to the actions we have witnessed in Albany this past week.




















1 response so far
1 stanford1 // Feb 10, 2010 at 11:51 am
I agree with Lazio. I have to think that Paterson has fallen out with the Dems and they are as much at his throat as anyone. I don’t agree with Paterson all that much but in the times I’ve witnessed him in interview sessions – he seems a reasonable person and certainly a very intelligent one. I suspect that has the Dems as troubled as anything. If he came across as an outspoken, flaming liberal, I think the NY Times might actually be looking into a Republican conspiracy to oust Paterson.
I certainly applaud Lazio and hope he will win and be a sound voice of reason throughout.
You must log in to post a comment.