<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pat Buchanan&#8217;s About Face on Taiwan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frumforum.com/pat-buchanans-about-face-on-taiwan/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frumforum.com/pat-buchanans-about-face-on-taiwan</link>
	<description>Building a conservatism that can win again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:50:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carney</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/pat-buchanans-about-face-on-taiwan/comment-page-1#comment-81958</link>
		<dc:creator>Carney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 02:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=21642#comment-81958</guid>
		<description>This is a valid criticism.

There is of course a valid answer, which is that the Cold War is over, and we no longer face the prospect, which was extremely grave and serious at the time, of Communism attempting a slow motion world conquest.  In that context, for both principled and pragmatic reasons, simply allowing any part of the world to fall to Communism was a dereliction of duty.

But today the Beijing regime is if anything a conventional authoritarian state at this point with only a veneer of Marxism retained for the sake of minimal continuity, and dealings with it can be had on a conventional Great Power to Great Power basis, rather than in the context of a planet-wide struggle between two multi-national and universalist ideologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a valid criticism.</p>
<p>There is of course a valid answer, which is that the Cold War is over, and we no longer face the prospect, which was extremely grave and serious at the time, of Communism attempting a slow motion world conquest.  In that context, for both principled and pragmatic reasons, simply allowing any part of the world to fall to Communism was a dereliction of duty.</p>
<p>But today the Beijing regime is if anything a conventional authoritarian state at this point with only a veneer of Marxism retained for the sake of minimal continuity, and dealings with it can be had on a conventional Great Power to Great Power basis, rather than in the context of a planet-wide struggle between two multi-national and universalist ideologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

