<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s Driving America Back to Europe in the 70s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frumforum.com/obamas-driving-america-back-to-europe-in-the-70s/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obamas-driving-america-back-to-europe-in-the-70s</link>
	<description>Building a conservatism that can win again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:50:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: barker13</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obamas-driving-america-back-to-europe-in-the-70s/comment-page-1#comment-57033</link>
		<dc:creator>barker13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=8407#comment-57033</guid>
		<description>Re: Dacookson // Jul 24, 2009 at 11:49 am --

&quot;I won’t be moving to France...&quot;

Suit yourself! (*GRIN*) (I hear the baguettes are to DIE for though!)

&quot;I’m not saying France is utopia...&quot;

I know. We both realize there is no &quot;utopia&quot; for the average person. (Give me a few hundred million dollars though and I&#039;ll be able to create my own personal utopia anywhere in the world - from the richest country to the poorest.) (*WINK*)

BILL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Dacookson // Jul 24, 2009 at 11:49 am &#8211;</p>
<p>&#8220;I won’t be moving to France&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Suit yourself! (*GRIN*) (I hear the baguettes are to DIE for though!)</p>
<p>&#8220;I’m not saying France is utopia&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I know. We both realize there is no &#8220;utopia&#8221; for the average person. (Give me a few hundred million dollars though and I&#8217;ll be able to create my own personal utopia anywhere in the world &#8211; from the richest country to the poorest.) (*WINK*)</p>
<p>BILL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ottovbvs</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obamas-driving-america-back-to-europe-in-the-70s/comment-page-1#comment-57031</link>
		<dc:creator>ottovbvs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=8407#comment-57031</guid>
		<description>a less socially mobile country than the US......oops France I meant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a less socially mobile country than the US&#8230;&#8230;oops France I meant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ottovbvs</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obamas-driving-america-back-to-europe-in-the-70s/comment-page-1#comment-57029</link>
		<dc:creator>ottovbvs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=8407#comment-57029</guid>
		<description>dacookson // Jul 24, 2009 at 11:49 am
&quot; That’s the just the way they like it,&quot;

..........And that&#039;s one of the reasons why I like it........And I&#039;ve never had to wait 20 minutes at Carrefour as you describe.......Actually France is one of the most well run countries in the world.....if you strip out all the asset bubble growth numbers of the last eight years their growth was basically the same as ours......and they have been the least affected western economy by the bubble bursting........there are also studies showing the US to be a less socially mobile country than the US.......I lived in France for four years and Britain about eight at two separate times......Both great.....both societies have neuroses of various sorts but nowhere near as bad as here and they are much more sceptical and basically happy I suppose(compare the atmosphere in an English pub with an American bar in middle America)  or so it seemed to me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dacookson // Jul 24, 2009 at 11:49 am<br />
&#8221; That’s the just the way they like it,&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.And that&#8217;s one of the reasons why I like it&#8230;&#8230;..And I&#8217;ve never had to wait 20 minutes at Carrefour as you describe&#8230;&#8230;.Actually France is one of the most well run countries in the world&#8230;..if you strip out all the asset bubble growth numbers of the last eight years their growth was basically the same as ours&#8230;&#8230;and they have been the least affected western economy by the bubble bursting&#8230;&#8230;..there are also studies showing the US to be a less socially mobile country than the US&#8230;&#8230;.I lived in France for four years and Britain about eight at two separate times&#8230;&#8230;Both great&#8230;..both societies have neuroses of various sorts but nowhere near as bad as here and they are much more sceptical and basically happy I suppose(compare the atmosphere in an English pub with an American bar in middle America)  or so it seemed to me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dacookson</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obamas-driving-america-back-to-europe-in-the-70s/comment-page-1#comment-57015</link>
		<dc:creator>dacookson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=8407#comment-57015</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t be moving to France I think Bill. There&#039;s lots of things that annoy my anglo-saxon sensibilities. I can&#039;t get my head around the shop opening hours, or waiting for 20 minutes in the line at a supermarket while a bunch of people pay for two items with a card, each transaction requiring a phonecall, but I don&#039;t think you can argue that it&#039;s a country struggling economically in a markedly different way to the rest of the western world. That&#039;s the just the way they like it, although &lt;a href=&quot;http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/07/23/france.sunday.shopping/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;things are changing&lt;/a&gt;. There&#039;s no doubt there are things that need to change but equally there are some things that don&#039;t.

I read the comment you mentioned and followed the link to his website which had a long and somewhat justified rant at the EU. I&#039;m not living in France but I know that even during the &#039;boom&#039;, people in Britain were making some of the same complaints. The 68ers aren&#039;t the real problem, the whole generation is. Social mobility is suffering everywhere because the post war generations have the good jobs and are living longer. Basically I&#039;m not saying France is utopia because it clearly isn&#039;t but I think the numbers seem to prove you can have certain social programmes and regulations without taking a hit on growth or quality of life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t be moving to France I think Bill. There&#8217;s lots of things that annoy my anglo-saxon sensibilities. I can&#8217;t get my head around the shop opening hours, or waiting for 20 minutes in the line at a supermarket while a bunch of people pay for two items with a card, each transaction requiring a phonecall, but I don&#8217;t think you can argue that it&#8217;s a country struggling economically in a markedly different way to the rest of the western world. That&#8217;s the just the way they like it, although things are changing. There&#8217;s no doubt there are things that need to change but equally there are some things that don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I read the comment you mentioned and followed the link to his website which had a long and somewhat justified rant at the EU. I&#8217;m not living in France but I know that even during the &#8216;boom&#8217;, people in Britain were making some of the same complaints. The 68ers aren&#8217;t the real problem, the whole generation is. Social mobility is suffering everywhere because the post war generations have the good jobs and are living longer. Basically I&#8217;m not saying France is utopia because it clearly isn&#8217;t but I think the numbers seem to prove you can have certain social programmes and regulations without taking a hit on growth or quality of life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ottovbvs</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obamas-driving-america-back-to-europe-in-the-70s/comment-page-1#comment-57010</link>
		<dc:creator>ottovbvs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=8407#comment-57010</guid>
		<description>.............BTW Mr Reinhoudt should read some Max Weber since he&#039;s German presumably......As he pointed out about 100 years ago the story of modernity is the bringing of more and more activities under the rule of rationality.......a theory that has been confirmed by events if ever one has.......even dating is becoming rationalized......it&#039;s ultimately why much of today&#039;s conservative canon particularly the religious and social bits are doomed........likewise the US healthcare system in 2009 doesn&#039;t pass the rationality test.......many parts of it have been rationalised but overall it&#039;s totally irrational if the aim is to provide a cost effective system of healthcare with access for all .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.BTW Mr Reinhoudt should read some Max Weber since he&#8217;s German presumably&#8230;&#8230;As he pointed out about 100 years ago the story of modernity is the bringing of more and more activities under the rule of rationality&#8230;&#8230;.a theory that has been confirmed by events if ever one has&#8230;&#8230;.even dating is becoming rationalized&#8230;&#8230;it&#8217;s ultimately why much of today&#8217;s conservative canon particularly the religious and social bits are doomed&#8230;&#8230;..likewise the US healthcare system in 2009 doesn&#8217;t pass the rationality test&#8230;&#8230;.many parts of it have been rationalised but overall it&#8217;s totally irrational if the aim is to provide a cost effective system of healthcare with access for all .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ottovbvs</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obamas-driving-america-back-to-europe-in-the-70s/comment-page-1#comment-56977</link>
		<dc:creator>ottovbvs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=8407#comment-56977</guid>
		<description>VA Shepherd // Jul 23, 2009 at 11:12 pm 
&quot;Otto must have the night off tonight. You can alway count on good old Otto to chime in for the left…I hope he’s all right!&quot;

...........A night at the theater in nyc and a very expensive dinner with she who must be obeyed.......Reinhoudt is spinning..........basically the Europeans have healthcare systems that cost 7- 10% of GDP.......there are different models but even when the paying side of the system is ostensibly to a large extent private as in France, the govt is in total control of them in reality.......... they cover everyone and by and large work very efficiently......I&#039;ve been treated in two of them.......sure they have cost problems but on nothing like the scale we do ........and no serious politician would ever suggest eliminating or substantially changing them........he&#039;s also exaggerating grossly the American budgetary problems which are entirely fixable........the CBO numbers he quotes are totally worthless.......government expenditures reaching 42% of GDP by 2050......that&#039;s 41 years away.........govt economists couldn&#039;t predict that the US economy was in serious trouble 18 months before it fell off a cliff!........this is for the birds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VA Shepherd // Jul 23, 2009 at 11:12 pm<br />
&#8220;Otto must have the night off tonight. You can alway count on good old Otto to chime in for the left…I hope he’s all right!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..A night at the theater in nyc and a very expensive dinner with she who must be obeyed&#8230;&#8230;.Reinhoudt is spinning&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.basically the Europeans have healthcare systems that cost 7- 10% of GDP&#8230;&#8230;.there are different models but even when the paying side of the system is ostensibly to a large extent private as in France, the govt is in total control of them in reality&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. they cover everyone and by and large work very efficiently&#8230;&#8230;I&#8217;ve been treated in two of them&#8230;&#8230;.sure they have cost problems but on nothing like the scale we do &#8230;&#8230;..and no serious politician would ever suggest eliminating or substantially changing them&#8230;&#8230;..he&#8217;s also exaggerating grossly the American budgetary problems which are entirely fixable&#8230;&#8230;..the CBO numbers he quotes are totally worthless&#8230;&#8230;.government expenditures reaching 42% of GDP by 2050&#8230;&#8230;that&#8217;s 41 years away&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;govt economists couldn&#8217;t predict that the US economy was in serious trouble 18 months before it fell off a cliff!&#8230;&#8230;..this is for the birds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SFTor1</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obamas-driving-america-back-to-europe-in-the-70s/comment-page-1#comment-56960</link>
		<dc:creator>SFTor1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=8407#comment-56960</guid>
		<description>sinz, we have health care for profit in the United States. The fiduciary responsibility of the corporation is diametrically opposed to the Hippocratic Oath, hence our problems. Health care is a national and economic asset, if you care to think about it for even a second. But it is a cost center and needs to be run as such. It is indeed permanent, as disease and injury are with us permanently.  We don&#039;t have to look only to France for health care ideas. Japan seems to be doing pretty well too. And we can save money by using the best ideas from those countries and others—permanently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sinz, we have health care for profit in the United States. The fiduciary responsibility of the corporation is diametrically opposed to the Hippocratic Oath, hence our problems. Health care is a national and economic asset, if you care to think about it for even a second. But it is a cost center and needs to be run as such. It is indeed permanent, as disease and injury are with us permanently.  We don&#8217;t have to look only to France for health care ideas. Japan seems to be doing pretty well too. And we can save money by using the best ideas from those countries and others—permanently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VA Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obamas-driving-america-back-to-europe-in-the-70s/comment-page-1#comment-56958</link>
		<dc:creator>VA Shepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=8407#comment-56958</guid>
		<description>Otto must have the night off tonight.  You can alway count on good old Otto to chime in for the left...I hope he&#039;s all right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Otto must have the night off tonight.  You can alway count on good old Otto to chime in for the left&#8230;I hope he&#8217;s all right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barker13</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obamas-driving-america-back-to-europe-in-the-70s/comment-page-1#comment-56919</link>
		<dc:creator>barker13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=8407#comment-56919</guid>
		<description>Re: Dacookson // Jul 23, 2009 at 3:30 pm --

Right back at you; thanks for posting the links you did.

The April &#039;07 Le Monde article is particularly interesting. It sounds to me like you should move to France, Dacook! (*GRIN*)

Seriously... the piece was interesting. Still, as I&#039;m sure you noted, it was effectively a piece of anti-Sarkozy campaign literature - a shot across the bow of the Sarkozy campaign&#039;s portrayal of the economic situation in France at the time. 

I&#039;d be interested in getting reading a critical review of the piece by someone qualified to do so. Quite frankly I don&#039;t have the requisite knowledge of the nuts and bolts of the French economic system to &quot;argue&quot; with what I read or the conclusions. 

Dacook. We&#039;re going back and forth in good faith, right? (*SMILE*) Did you scroll down the comments attached to the article in question? Go back to the article... start scrolling... right around the middle you&#039;ll find a post titled, &quot;France is inded in decline,&quot; submitted by skovgaard on Fri May 4th, 2007 at 08:32:04 PM EST.

As previously noted, I&#039;m not an expert on France. (*SMILE*) I do know about the &quot;&#039;68&#039;ers&quot; though and am familiar with the social/intellectual stratification of the French civil service and the linkage between &quot;the Academy&quot; and government and business as well. (Skull &amp; Bones has nothing on these cats!) (*GRIN*) (Hell... the Brits are pikers at putting the &quot;C&quot; into &quot;Class&quot; when it comes to the way the French civil service moves their folks up the ladder...)

Anyway... bottom line... between the two of us we&#039;ve hopefully exposed our fellow posters to interesting and useful information that might impact the way they think about issues such as the proper role of government, how much is too much, how much isn&#039;t enough, etc.

BILL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Dacookson // Jul 23, 2009 at 3:30 pm &#8211;</p>
<p>Right back at you; thanks for posting the links you did.</p>
<p>The April &#8216;07 Le Monde article is particularly interesting. It sounds to me like you should move to France, Dacook! (*GRIN*)</p>
<p>Seriously&#8230; the piece was interesting. Still, as I&#8217;m sure you noted, it was effectively a piece of anti-Sarkozy campaign literature &#8211; a shot across the bow of the Sarkozy campaign&#8217;s portrayal of the economic situation in France at the time. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested in getting reading a critical review of the piece by someone qualified to do so. Quite frankly I don&#8217;t have the requisite knowledge of the nuts and bolts of the French economic system to &#8220;argue&#8221; with what I read or the conclusions. </p>
<p>Dacook. We&#8217;re going back and forth in good faith, right? (*SMILE*) Did you scroll down the comments attached to the article in question? Go back to the article&#8230; start scrolling&#8230; right around the middle you&#8217;ll find a post titled, &#8220;France is inded in decline,&#8221; submitted by skovgaard on Fri May 4th, 2007 at 08:32:04 PM EST.</p>
<p>As previously noted, I&#8217;m not an expert on France. (*SMILE*) I do know about the &#8220;&#8216;68&#8242;ers&#8221; though and am familiar with the social/intellectual stratification of the French civil service and the linkage between &#8220;the Academy&#8221; and government and business as well. (Skull &amp; Bones has nothing on these cats!) (*GRIN*) (Hell&#8230; the Brits are pikers at putting the &#8220;C&#8221; into &#8220;Class&#8221; when it comes to the way the French civil service moves their folks up the ladder&#8230;)</p>
<p>Anyway&#8230; bottom line&#8230; between the two of us we&#8217;ve hopefully exposed our fellow posters to interesting and useful information that might impact the way they think about issues such as the proper role of government, how much is too much, how much isn&#8217;t enough, etc.</p>
<p>BILL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dacookson</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obamas-driving-america-back-to-europe-in-the-70s/comment-page-1#comment-56901</link>
		<dc:creator>dacookson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=8407#comment-56901</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an interesting article Bill and thanks for posting it. It&#039;s true there are problems in transposing the two systems. There&#039;s a few things I&#039;d say. Firstly American health spending is already significantly higher than France so what the author says is that the cost benefits would vanish because of wages. But it still means you&#039;re probably paying much the same but getting universal coverage instead. It strikes me that there are a number of people who are overpaid in a somewhat exploitative system so some will lose out but the nation will reap the economic benefits of having a more healthy workforce. It&#039;s also worth noting that the UK has pretty good pay, better than France, but has a free system, article &lt;a href=&quot;http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/15/how-much-do-doctors-in-other-countries-make/?apage=2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. The systems can&#039;t just be easily transposed and other reforms would probably need to take place in education costs for example, but it&#039;s well within the ability of the US to deal with those problems over time without coming out the other end as homosexual communists driving one of &lt;a href=&quot;http://homepage.ntlworld.com/keith.adams/rootes/images/dev1100_02.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;these&lt;/a&gt;. 

The second is that chronic high French unemployment is a myth. The French include students and other groups in their stats that other countries do not. I heard an interview by Jerome Guillet, article &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eurotrib.com/story/2007/5/4/113029/9034&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, claiming that if you took out the top 0.1% of earners from GDP, growth in France is higher than the UK and US, benefiting the middle class. It&#039;s worth reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an interesting article Bill and thanks for posting it. It&#8217;s true there are problems in transposing the two systems. There&#8217;s a few things I&#8217;d say. Firstly American health spending is already significantly higher than France so what the author says is that the cost benefits would vanish because of wages. But it still means you&#8217;re probably paying much the same but getting universal coverage instead. It strikes me that there are a number of people who are overpaid in a somewhat exploitative system so some will lose out but the nation will reap the economic benefits of having a more healthy workforce. It&#8217;s also worth noting that the UK has pretty good pay, better than France, but has a free system, article here. The systems can&#8217;t just be easily transposed and other reforms would probably need to take place in education costs for example, but it&#8217;s well within the ability of the US to deal with those problems over time without coming out the other end as homosexual communists driving one of these. </p>
<p>The second is that chronic high French unemployment is a myth. The French include students and other groups in their stats that other countries do not. I heard an interview by Jerome Guillet, article here, claiming that if you took out the top 0.1% of earners from GDP, growth in France is higher than the UK and US, benefiting the middle class. It&#8217;s worth reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

