<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Flunks History, Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frumforum.com/obama-flunks-history-again/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obama-flunks-history-again</link>
	<description>Building a conservatism that can win again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:32:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pajamas Media &#187; David Irving and the Banality of Revisionism</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obama-flunks-history-again/comment-page-2#comment-64084</link>
		<dc:creator>Pajamas Media &#187; David Irving and the Banality of Revisionism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-64084</guid>
		<description>[...] and political expediency, however, it was stylized into such by the Obama administration. See my “Obama Flunks History, Again.”) Page 1 of 2 &#160;Next [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and political expediency, however, it was stylized into such by the Obama administration. See my “Obama Flunks History, Again.”) Page 1 of 2 &nbsp;Next [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haloagain</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obama-flunks-history-again/comment-page-2#comment-47075</link>
		<dc:creator>haloagain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-47075</guid>
		<description>No doubt the typo in the first sentence of my last post will invalidate any opinion I have to someone as nit-picky as this fool. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt the typo in the first sentence of my last post will invalidate any opinion I have to someone as nit-picky as this fool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haloagain</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obama-flunks-history-again/comment-page-2#comment-42180</link>
		<dc:creator>haloagain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-42180</guid>
		<description>good lord --&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Post&#039;s this idiotic make me sad to be human. I&#039;m honestly interested in hearing reasonable, intellectually honest conservative opinions. I thought this site might be a good resource. Turns out, there aren&#039;t any intellectual conservatives left. You&#039;re all so pathetic. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good lord &#8211;</p>
<p>Post&#8217;s this idiotic make me sad to be human. I&#8217;m honestly interested in hearing reasonable, intellectually honest conservative opinions. I thought this site might be a good resource. Turns out, there aren&#8217;t any intellectual conservatives left. You&#8217;re all so pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ericna</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obama-flunks-history-again/comment-page-1#comment-52097</link>
		<dc:creator>ericna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 06:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-52097</guid>
		<description>Quite right. What Obama should have said was &quot;Tomorrow, I will visit a normal concentration camp where lots of people, including a substantial number of Jews, but not one of the really bad death camps in Poland where millions of Jews died. Those I will perhaps visit later, but right now I am going to Germany and as none of the real death camps are located in Germany, Buchenwald will have to do. Of course, I could refer to Buchenwald as a KZ-camp that was part of to Holocaust, which would be a powerful message to the worlds Muslims. But then some idiot writer for New Majority will complain that the ratio of killed Jews at Buchenwald was too small to be used as an example of a Holocaust concentration camp and use this to make a rather a cheap shot while coat-tailing on the suffering of millions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite right. What Obama should have said was &#8220;Tomorrow, I will visit a normal concentration camp where lots of people, including a substantial number of Jews, but not one of the really bad death camps in Poland where millions of Jews died. Those I will perhaps visit later, but right now I am going to Germany and as none of the real death camps are located in Germany, Buchenwald will have to do. Of course, I could refer to Buchenwald as a KZ-camp that was part of to Holocaust, which would be a powerful message to the worlds Muslims. But then some idiot writer for New Majority will complain that the ratio of killed Jews at Buchenwald was too small to be used as an example of a Holocaust concentration camp and use this to make a rather a cheap shot while coat-tailing on the suffering of millions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: </title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obama-flunks-history-again/comment-page-1#comment-46828</link>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 00:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-46828</guid>
		<description>Patrick and Gibberish:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your comments could not be more accurate.  Even though I&#039;m a left of center Dem, I had come to this site hoping to hear both fresh policy ideas from the Right and thoughtful and honest criticisms of Obama&#039;s policies.  Unfortunately, except in very rare instances, I&#039;ve gotten neither.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;These failures probably mean the Right is much further away from developing fresh ideas than any of us thought.  While that&#039;s politically good for me and the Dems in the short term, I think it tends to hurt the country over the long term.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Neither the articles on this site, nor most of the commenters seem capable of offering thoughtful, intellectually honest criticisms of Obama&#039;s policies.  Instead, they pick out the most trivial inconsequential minutae.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s really disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick and Gibberish:</p>
<p>Your comments could not be more accurate.  Even though I&#8217;m a left of center Dem, I had come to this site hoping to hear both fresh policy ideas from the Right and thoughtful and honest criticisms of Obama&#8217;s policies.  Unfortunately, except in very rare instances, I&#8217;ve gotten neither.</p>
<p>These failures probably mean the Right is much further away from developing fresh ideas than any of us thought.  While that&#8217;s politically good for me and the Dems in the short term, I think it tends to hurt the country over the long term.</p>
<p>Neither the articles on this site, nor most of the commenters seem capable of offering thoughtful, intellectually honest criticisms of Obama&#8217;s policies.  Instead, they pick out the most trivial inconsequential minutae.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s really disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: balconesfault</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obama-flunks-history-again/comment-page-1#comment-44762</link>
		<dc:creator>balconesfault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 00:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-44762</guid>
		<description>&quot;Is there a single example, anywhere on this blog, where an article author has come down here with us rabble in the comments and responded to criticism in any way?&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes - I can&#039;t remember the poster, but he was talking about how the detainees issue is now Obama&#039;s issue, and not Bush&#039;s, responded to commentors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Is there a single example, anywhere on this blog, where an article author has come down here with us rabble in the comments and responded to criticism in any way?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes &#8211; I can&#8217;t remember the poster, but he was talking about how the detainees issue is now Obama&#8217;s issue, and not Bush&#8217;s, responded to commentors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gibberish</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obama-flunks-history-again/comment-page-1#comment-53443</link>
		<dc:creator>gibberish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 18:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53443</guid>
		<description>It is a failing - the absence of any interest in replying to comments. Or at least explaining what these postings have as their goal&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seems to me after all the excitement of the anti-Limbaugh campaign a little while back they haven&#039;t noticed that this site risks just being a more erudite version of the ranters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe they should look into how William F Buckley did it:&lt;br&gt;http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00kwfbz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a failing &#8211; the absence of any interest in replying to comments. Or at least explaining what these postings have as their goal</p>
<p>Seems to me after all the excitement of the anti-Limbaugh campaign a little while back they haven&#8217;t noticed that this site risks just being a more erudite version of the ranters.</p>
<p>Maybe they should look into how William F Buckley did it:<br /><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00kwfbz" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00kwfbz</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obama-flunks-history-again/comment-page-1#comment-47053</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 17:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-47053</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not just the content that is failing to live up to the stated goals of this site, but the fact that there is no engagement by those who generate the content.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is typical of how the old-school GOP operates - &quot;we tell you what to think and that&#039;s all there is to it&quot;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They don&#039;t listen to us, they refuse to engage us and are bewildered at why the GOP is in the ditch.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is there a single example, anywhere on this blog, where an article author has come down here with us rabble in the comments and responded to criticism in any way?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The credibility issue is huge for me. You cannot regain my trust by telling me what to think. You can BEGIN regain my trust by talking WITH me as an adult and equal, and responding to my concerns.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t see that happening here - or anywhere in the right-wing for that matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just the content that is failing to live up to the stated goals of this site, but the fact that there is no engagement by those who generate the content.</p>
<p>It is typical of how the old-school GOP operates &#8211; &#8220;we tell you what to think and that&#8217;s all there is to it&#8221;.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t listen to us, they refuse to engage us and are bewildered at why the GOP is in the ditch.</p>
<p>Is there a single example, anywhere on this blog, where an article author has come down here with us rabble in the comments and responded to criticism in any way?</p>
<p>The credibility issue is huge for me. You cannot regain my trust by telling me what to think. You can BEGIN regain my trust by talking WITH me as an adult and equal, and responding to my concerns.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see that happening here &#8211; or anywhere in the right-wing for that matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nealjking</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obama-flunks-history-again/comment-page-1#comment-47936</link>
		<dc:creator>nealjking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 16:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-47936</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, but Rosenthal&#039;s piece is total idiocy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but Rosenthal&#8217;s piece is total idiocy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: balconesfault</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/obama-flunks-history-again/comment-page-1#comment-51718</link>
		<dc:creator>balconesfault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 12:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-51718</guid>
		<description>gibberish - good point.  You&#039;d have to fault the gatekeepers here - snarks about Obama really aren&#039;t a pathway to reforming the Republican Party and conservatism, are they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gibberish &#8211; good point.  You&#8217;d have to fault the gatekeepers here &#8211; snarks about Obama really aren&#8217;t a pathway to reforming the Republican Party and conservatism, are they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
