Comments on: Martha Coakley’s Lowest Blows

By: Brown barracks Obama as NHS plans suffer coronary « Philtheone.com

Brown barracks Obama as NHS plans suffer coronary « Philtheone.com — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:30:32 +0000

[...] because he associated with and implicated himself in Martha Coakley’s aggressive, unpopular smear campaign that preferred to make Scott Brown look bad rather than herself look [...]

By: balconesfault

balconesfault — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:06:43 +0000

“By the way (balconesfault), it’s spelled “copyright (not copywrite).”

jabbermule, we’ve all learned in past dealings with Balconesfault, woe to thee who trieth to correcth the nave on his ideas or grammar.

Actually, I appreciate corrections on points of fact.

By: kevin47

kevin47 — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:39:18 +0000

“maybe it is , but most people and I didn’t associate it with the WTC.”

Then what was the point of using the image in the ad? In addition to being repugnant, it was incoherent as well.

Come to think of it, that just about sums up Coakley’s candidacy. Everything makes sense now.

By: sinz54

sinz54 — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:59:33 +0000

The seething hatred the liberals are now feeling for Brown is evident from this column by liberal Jonathan Chait in The New Republic, a liberal journal I used to respect:

http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/panic

Of all the photos he could run of Scott Brown, the one he selected was the Cosmo picture from 20 years ago.

Is The New Republic competing with the National Enquirer now?

By: GOProud

GOProud — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:40:26 +0000

“By the way (balconesfault), it’s spelled “copyright (not copywrite).”

jabbermule, we’ve all learned in past dealings with Balconesfault, woe to thee who trieth to correcth the nave on his ideas or grammar. Shame on you for forgetting or, worse yet on Friends-of-Frum, not heeding the lesson.

By: jabbermule

jabbermule — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:45:30 +0000

balconesfault:

“Anyway, I’m pretty much thinking that the 9/11 obsessed sort are the only ones who see that footage and think 9/11, particularly given the text of the ads.”

Given the left’s cavalier attitude about the worst terrorist attack in the history of mankind, I’m glad some in America continue to be obsessed with 9/11 (i.e intelligence community, military, law enforcement) so people like you can continue to hide your heads in the sand about the possibility of yet another, potentially far worse, 9/11-style attack.

By the way, it’s spelled “copyright.”

By: jakester

jakester — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:23:28 +0000

kevin47
maybe it is , but most people and I didn’t associate it with the WTC. It would be like a shot of the lobby or the public restrooms of the WTC, only some consummate insider or nerd would pick that out.

By: kevin47

kevin47 — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 05:44:53 +0000

“Got to agree with you, that is a standard looking Wall Street type skyscraper,”

You’ve got to agree with him? It’s not a matter of opinion. It is the WTC.

By: jakester

jakester — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 05:34:51 +0000

balconesfault
Got to agree with you, that is a standard looking Wall Street type skyscraper, the 9/11 tie in is a real reach. Also the quip about the ad discouraging young women from entering politics makes about as much sense as right wingers who could give a fig about civil rights talking about all the racists and anti-semites running a party full Jews and Blacks

By: balconesfault

balconesfault — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:30:14 +0000

Ayla Brown, Scott’s daughter and a former American Idol contestant, defended her father fiercely, saying that the ad “represents everything that discourages young women from getting involved in politics, and as a young woman, I’m completely offended by that.”

So a woman running for Senate is discouraging young women from getting into politics?

I wonder how she feels about cries at political rallies to stick curling irons in certain portions of the female candidate’s anatomy?