I attended the premiere of this film hoping that it would be dismal, or at least corny enough to be entertaining. Yet despite its many faults, Tea Party: The Documentary Film managed to do well in capturing the energy behind the Tea Party protests, and skilfully presented profiles of individuals driven by frustration to rally against government overreaching.
The narrative is clear: the Tea Party Patriots are all ordinary people with ordinary lives and ordinary ambitions. Among the protagonists: Jack, a baseball coach and father of two; William, a former government employee who is now a pastor; and Jenny Beth, a former small business owner.
The movie follows the paths of Tea Party movement from the nascent irritation over TARP; from there to frustration over the stimulus; which continued to aggravation at cap and trade; then to dissatisfaction with czars; finally culminating in an paroxysm of irritation at the 9/12 tea party protests.
“Why am I going to D.C.? I’m going to get on the bullhorn. I’m going to yell, I’m going to scream,” said Nate, an African American who voted for Obama for reasons of race but was soon turned off by rampant government spending.
The message, if you haven’t gotten it yet, is that they’re pissed off. With everything. And who could blame them?
Jenny Beth tells a poignant story about the repossession of her home, located on a busy street. One can’t help but feel pity for someone who had to bear the humiliation of having their earthly possessions strewn haphazardly across their front yard for all the passing traffic to see.
Their fury is palpable – and understandable. A government which intervenes to save bankers – among the most well off in society – while allowing people like Jenny Beth to lose their homes inspires resentment easily. The old adage “socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor” rings especially true for these Tea Partiers.
However, once you get beyond the visceral emotion, a second look reveals a glaring flaw in the film: a failure to acknowledge the real problem of undesirable nuts in the movement.
William, a white pastor for a predominately black church, emphasizes that he’s not racist, and you know what? I believe him. But neither he nor the other protestors make much of an attempt to denounce the movement’s real extremists: the birthers, the truthers, the conspiracy theorists, and the real racists in their camp.
The film’s largest shortcoming is its revisionism – not a single odious slogan is chanted, not a single offensive sign is to be seen. Having reported from numerous tea partiers, I can say that this is highly unrealistic. It takes no effort to find an extremist at a Tea Party.
As such, it seems highly likely that the documentary’s producers deliberately left out footage of controversial persons and signs. After all, had you only seen the movie, you would be under the impression that this is a completely reasonable group of people, out exercising their democratic rights. The crazies may not have been in the mainstream of the movement, but they were certainly commonplace enough that it would have taken a contrived effort to leave them out of this film.
The film leaves the impression of a movement which can mobilize with amazing speed and enthusiasm, yet lacks the will to mobilize against the extremist elements within it. United only by a sense of frustration over government spending, the Tea Party movement appears to splinter over most other issues.
In fact, the movement can’t even decide if it represents a mainstream majority or a small but admirable group of principled radicals. Obviously you can’t be both, and yet this movie tries to circle that square.
A constant argument through the movie was that the Tea Partiers weren’t a fringe element in American political life, but rather a “sleeping giant” of the mainstream that had been awoken – that in reality their positions were now the new center of the political spectrum.
Yet in his introduction of the film, Congressman Tom Price proudly characterized the movement as a resilient but small band of brothers, quoting Samuel Adams: “It doesn’t take a majority to prevail, but an irate and tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom.”
Whether or not they’re a minority, the metaphor is apt. Tea Partiers across the country have indeed set off brushfires – but irate individuals don’t handle matches very well.
This Tea Party film misses all the instances in which extremists in their camp have set off dangerously wild fires. In a way, this documentary is a perfect reflection of the movement’s failure to denounce the evil amongst them. Even worse, this movie pretends it doesn’t exist. And isn’t that a crime of its own?
49 responses so far
1 MI-GOPer // Dec 4, 2009 at 11:47 am
Wow, Tim.
I am amazed that you again find another opportunity to try to bash the legitimate effort of people to engage in a Constitutionally protected, multiple right experience and to film said activities… and you find fault with that and label their bias a crime?
I wonder if you were as vehement when the MSM was trying to get Obama elected and their bias was apparent?
I wonder if you were as vehement when the Left tried to manufacture countless fake charges against Bush 41 (remember Slick Willy suggesting ol man Bush was snagging some diplomat babe while high in the Alps?) or Bush 43 or Palin.
I think you probably should have taken a moment out and realized that this documentary is no less or more biased that Oscar awarded Gore’s fake about global warming. Or MikeyMoore’s fact-challenged films on Columbine, Health Scare and even his first about GM.
You can do a whole lot better than this, Tim. I’ll let all the echo chambered trolls and democrat activists now jump on board to claim your insight worthy of it’s own Oscar… or would that be Tony?
2 balconesfault // Dec 4, 2009 at 11:54 am
Tim, you could also make the argument that the filmmakers are actively trying to marginalize the craziness that fueled much of the tea bag movement by excluding it. Although in reality, that’s like trying to appreciate a Shelby GT500KR racing past you without being able to hear the roar of its engine.
If the movement actually did what the filmmakers edit it to do … sending out a clear signal that they didn’t want the birthers, the truthers, the conspiracy theorists, and the real racists to be marching with them … Fox would need to hit the archives once again or the “march” would look on TV like the “John McCain for President” rallies would have looked had he not signed up Palin to juice the crowds.
3 sinz54 // Dec 4, 2009 at 12:01 pm
To me, a hallmark of integrity is one’s willingness to clean up his own act.
For years, we conservatives criticized liberals for their unwillingness to face the crazies on their own left flank:
http://zombietime.com/hall_of_shame/
Whereas in the 1950s, Buckley’s new National Review launched a successful campaign to get rid of the crazies–the John Birch Society and Ayn Rand’s Objectivists–and make conservatism respectable to Middle America.
Buckley is gone, but we conservatives should follow his example by making sure that once again, Birthers have no place in the conservative movement.
RedState.com, which is no fan of Obama, has banned Birthers from posting their tripe.
4 BarryS // Dec 4, 2009 at 12:08 pm
We have had birthers here. I;m not sure what Mi-Goper thinks of the birther freak-show. Maybe he would let us know.
To airbrush out all the crazies from this film again is Stalinist in the extreme. The right has actually gone so far right that it’s now the far far left fringe. Almost communist in it’s zeal to revise history and promote conspiracy theories. Using Faux news as it’s Pravda it just does not exist in the real world.
5 MI-GOPer // Dec 4, 2009 at 12:17 pm
Of course, for hard core democrat activists like balconesfault, for anyone to try to portray the Tea Party or TownHall movements as anything but crazies goes against the lessons they learned in Saul Alinsky 101 class at the DailyKos… “present your foe as irrational and crazy, make them appear abnormal in any way”.
I’ve stood with those Tea Partiers (and balconesfault, can you try not to use the derogatory phrase teabagger on this site dedicated to rebuilding the conservative movement and GOP… when I say “you” I also mean your various sundry fake names too)… and they are not crazy or irrational.
They were moms and dads and vets and cops and students and business leaders and govt workers who disagree with both Republicans and Democrats. Many of them weren’t in sync with Obama either… i saw flag label pins, I heard the Natl Anthem played and sung without stumbling over the lines like the President does and I saw an honest respect for the public square and civil debate that partisans in both camps could learn from.
I didn’t see a single “birther” sign. Unlike CodePink rallies for the Left, I didn’t see any cartoonish signs displaying the president having a homosexual act with his veep or his peeps (yep, CodePink used to do that often with Bush and Cheney and Rove and McCain). I didn’t see any signs calling America a Nazi State like I have at Democrat rallies on the enviroment, gay rights or global change.
Maybe the film makers didn’t have to do all that much work “cleaning” up the crazies as you say, Tim. They wouldn’t have had to at the 8 rallies I attended.
6 MI-GOPer // Dec 4, 2009 at 12:18 pm
Thank you BarryS for proving the Saul Alinsky manual was checked out of balconesfault’ library by you… we thought ottoBS had it.
7 About tea party movie, tea party:, movie premiere, documentary, film, movement | Find me About // Dec 4, 2009 at 12:18 pm
[...] I attended the premiere of this film hoping that it would be dismal, or at least corny enough to be entertaining. Yet despite its many faults, Tea Party: The DocumentaryFilm managed to do well in capturing the energy behind the Tea Party protests, …Read Original Story: Making the Tea Parties G-Rated – FrumForum [...]
8 BarryS // Dec 4, 2009 at 12:22 pm
“Buckley is gone, but we conservatives should follow his example by making sure that once again, Birthers have no place in the conservative movement.”
Problem is Sinz the GOP leadership actually support and encourage these activities. They can no longer condemn the crazy fringe because they are 20% of the base. Anyone who criticizes will be get a primary from the far right.
Where is the leader who will stand up and say enough is enough? Boner, Cantor, anyone?
9 BarryS // Dec 4, 2009 at 12:23 pm
Are you a birther MI-Goper? It would be nice to know
10 MI-GOPer // Dec 4, 2009 at 12:23 pm
If FoxNews is Pravda, BarryS, why does FoxNews continue to gain more market share, have higher rated news shows than liberally-biased, conventional MSM cable shows and hold a more diverse audience than any pro-Democrat cable show on the air?
I know… you have to admit that Americans are idiots at some point. Or, at least, those who watch cable news. I guess you democrat activist guys still have the Op Ed and Letters to the Editor pages at all those leftwing newspapers… they sure are profitable and capture America’s notice. LOL.
And, of course, you can still come on conservative and GOP blogs and flame, annoy, irritate, disrupt and distract with abandon, right?
11 balconesfault // Dec 4, 2009 at 12:26 pm
and balconesfault, can you try not to use the derogatory phrase teabagger on this site dedicated to rebuilding the conservative movement and GOP…
I actually explicitly did not use that term, if you’ll note.
when I say “you” I also mean your various sundry fake names too
Ahh … so I’m still dealing with delusional MI-GOPer. Who is now demonstrating himself to be gutless MI-GOPer, by not demanding that Frum ban all us supposed multiple personalities from the list. As you’ve previously noted, it would be simple to check and achieve.
Are you afraid that if you make that demand, Independent might disappear from the board, btw?
12 BarryS // Dec 4, 2009 at 12:27 pm
What is your view of the birthers Mi-Goper. Do you agree with them?
13 CentristNYer // Dec 4, 2009 at 12:27 pm
“Tea Party: The Documentary Film managed to do well in capturing the energy behind the Tea Party protests, and skilfully presented profiles of individuals driven by frustration to rally against government overreaching.”
Um, where we these people during the Bush years? Where were their complaints about wiretapping, waterboarding, justice department abuses, intelligence failures and the efforts to muzzle scientists? Most were silent. Or sparing in their complaints. Or willing to turn a blind eye.
I can support some of the tea partier’s general goals with regard to controlling spending or reducing the deficit, but I have a hard time taking them seriously when so many sat on their hands for the last decade, allowing Bush/Cheney unprecedented government overreach.
(Also agree with Barry that airbrushing the birther/Beck contingent out of the film is worthy of the Kremlin.)
14 BarryS // Dec 4, 2009 at 12:30 pm
Pravda had a huge readership probably the biggest in the world. Mind it was the only one available.
Fox is not a news channel it is an opinion channel that distributes often word for word GOP information.
15 PracticalGirl // Dec 4, 2009 at 12:31 pm
Tim says
“Their fury is palpable – and understandable. A government which intervenes to save bankers – among the most well off in society – while allowing people like Jenny Beth to lose their homes inspires resentment easily. ”
Ignoring the extremeist element in this “documentary”-read, “propaganda piece”- is not the only mistake this movement is making. My heart goes out to those who are losing their homes, but so many of them are losing them because of Ponzi-like financing..And the government was complicit in it all. the American Dream Act, Zero Down Payment etc-all in the face of a weak Fannie and Freddie according to the same folks who sold us these programs- were disasterous.
How refreshing it would be if the Tea Partiers would look at the whole picture instead of half of it to justify their anger. And the whole picture includes the nasty element that this “documentary” left out.
But revolution without solution coupled with absolution for those in their fold is all they are about.
16 jabbermule // Dec 4, 2009 at 12:38 pm
Wow, this site has just about been completely overrun by leftist trolls. What do you trolls aim to accomplish by trashing one of the few websites that attempts to make a principled, Buckley-esque argument for conservatism? You’re not going to change my mind; quite the contrary — by highlighting your socialist-pacifist lunacy, it only confirms the necessity for a conservative comeback in America’s political arena.
balconesfault: You said “tea bag.” Close enough.
17 BarryS // Dec 4, 2009 at 12:39 pm
MiGoper you are usually so profuse with your words, telling us all we need to know. Why are you so silent on the great birther controversy?
Come on now give us your view, tell us are you a true believer in the birth certificate or not. Was Obama born in the USA and is he an American citizen. I know you have an opinion, you have one on everything. So what is is oh oracle give us the wisdom.
18 LFC // Dec 4, 2009 at 12:46 pm
Taking the crazies out of the mix, I have three major problems with the Tea Partiers. One, they seem to simply be angry, but seem to be all over the map on what they’re angry about. Two, when I see interviews, they seem to be incredibly ignorant of basic factual information that is readily available. Three, they offer zero solutions to anything.
The GOP seems to be eager to harness their anger, without actually doing the hard work of addressing and articulating their issues. And the GOP certainly isn’t attempting anything that smacks of solutions.
I, for one, would be very interested in somebody in the GOP diving in to the deep end of the pool and producing a detailed list of grievances of these people, along with proposed solutions. Then at least I’d have something to assess other than the fact that the Tea Partiers are really, really angry.
19 PracticalGirl // Dec 4, 2009 at 12:46 pm
Jabbermule,
Calling people names is silly. State an opinion, let it rise or fall, but leave the empty rhetoric behind.
What, if anything, are the Teas Partiers and their multitude of sitting politicians actually leading people towards? Riling up the base with no solution is not necessary, as there are 7 million blogs out there, 1,700 plus radio talk stations with a listenership of around 40 million per week, Fox News and their perspective screamers etc.
Propose something meaningful, and perhaps you’ll find less frustration. Supporting propaganda, though, won’t do it.
20 garlic // Dec 4, 2009 at 1:01 pm
I thought this article on wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_Party_protests) talking about what the tea party protestors want was an interesting read.
21 mdjoey // Dec 4, 2009 at 1:09 pm
This film does not appear to be any more or less packaged than Michael Moore’s, showing what the filmmaker wants us to see and leaving out the fringe folks. I’ve been to a couple of tea parties in person, standing with families, professionals, and citizens of all races, occupations and political parties. Yes, there were nuts there too, that’s not the point.
What is meaningful is the fact that a growing number of people are dissatisfied with the behavior of our representitives, who seem intent on pushing through an agenda that rightfully scares conservatives and plenty of mainstream Americans as well. People go out in public because their views are NOT represented in the newspapers or on most TV stations, and they’ve written to their senators and been dissed, and they are sick of it. Town halls held in union headquarters, or where questions were either screened or ignored are not acceptable, people want this arrogant congress to listen to us, either individually or in groups, we want you to know your actions are not as fully supported by the public than you think.
It takes a lot of effort to get this message out when some news channels appear to be state media, and community organizers, unions and senators bribing each other in their healthcare bill; we are here, we are watching you and there are more of us than you think. What’s wrong with sending that message, while we wait for the corrective action that will come in November 2010 and 2012?
22 BarryS // Dec 4, 2009 at 1:13 pm
Mi-Goper come in your time is up.
Where are you hiding, our troll hunting censor. Please pretty please won’t you come back and say if you are a birther or not. Come out come out wherever you are.
23 PracticalGirl // Dec 4, 2009 at 1:21 pm
Garlic,
Sure, that’s their basic premise, but do note: Nobody ever organized any of this stuff in protest of any of the outrageous spending under Bush. Sure, they say now that Bush is guilty of “some Socialism”, but WHY can the right never stand up against their own when it makes a difference?
BTW: Not sure about the Tea Partiers themselves, but their political leaders (Boehner, Bachmann et al) scream regularly about a return to the Bush tax cuts…Which, of course, were completely funded with borrowed money, making the deficit larger and actually costing the taxpayer money. Besides the fact that the tax cuts didn’t deliver anything close to their billing, how does going back to a system of borrowing to save face help their (our our) cause?
Bottom line: The Tea Partiers have had their day, shown their might. But if their political leaders can’t translate any of it into coherent, workable policies that aren’t just more of the same, who cares?
What’s the political plan that will save all in response to all the anger? In the end, that’s all that matters, but so far all the leadership can do is baskk in the popularity and publicity it gets them. I could swear the GOP had something to say about “celebrity” in politics during the election…Now if only they believed it.
24 ottovbvs // Dec 4, 2009 at 1:23 pm
…..somehow I don’t think this sanitized summer of the tea partiers will be breaking any box office records…..do you?
25 PracticalGirl // Dec 4, 2009 at 1:23 pm
BarryS:
Haven’t you noticed? This is MiGOPers download time. He’s spending some quality time with Glenn Beck and Fox News so he can figure out a new word for “troll”.
26 PracticalGirl // Dec 4, 2009 at 1:25 pm
Otto:
Probably not any “box office records”. But propaganda producers aren’t after anyone new. This is simply a vertical marketing technique designed only to speak to those who already believe it and just want to hear it again at the MOVIES!!
27 LFC // Dec 4, 2009 at 1:25 pm
MI-GOPers metric is… If FoxNews is Pravda, BarryS, why does FoxNews continue to gain more market share, have higher rated news shows than liberally-biased, conventional MSM cable shows and hold a more diverse audience than any pro-Democrat cable show on the air?
By the metric of popularity, Abba is only second to the Beatles over the past 50 years or so. MI-GOPer, do you feel that Abba is the second greatest musical group every to be assembled since 1960? Using your style of metric, you do.
Follow-up Question: And just how many times have you seen “Mamma Mia”?
28 BarryS // Dec 4, 2009 at 1:28 pm
“BarryS:
Haven’t you noticed? This is MiGOPers download time. He’s spending some quality time with Glenn Beck and Fox News so he can figure out a new word for “troll”.”
Nope he is hiding out in the Uncertain trumpet thread. I just found him and asked the same question there. I guess he will then run away to another thread. He can run but he cant hide forever. As Bush said I want him dead or alive. Hope I am more successful than Bush!
29 PracticalGirl // Dec 4, 2009 at 1:30 pm
LFC:
Shhhhh…MiGOPer already has glenn Beck turned up as loud as he can. Have some resppect for his education hours.
30 PracticalGirl // Dec 4, 2009 at 1:32 pm
As the kids say,, OMG.
MiGOPer can post AND get reeducated at the same time? Newfound respect for him
31 BarryS // Dec 4, 2009 at 1:39 pm
MiGOPer.
I know you are peeking here and not responding. Now come out and give us your supreme wisdom oh great one. You have an opinion on everything under the sun. Give us the fruit of your great knowledge on the birther issue. Are you a true believer oh troll chaser.
32 BarryS // Dec 4, 2009 at 1:41 pm
MiGOPer can post AND get reeducated at the same time? Newfound respect for him
Nope he gets “Independent” to learn for him while he blogs. It’s a great advantage of having multiple personalities.
33 BarryS // Dec 4, 2009 at 1:54 pm
I found the missing MI-GOPer.
He was searching for his gonads somewhere in Detroit. He lost those important appendages sometime about 12.23 and has not found them. Last I heard they had been turned into a pair of Trucknutz (TM) and were on the freeway to Lancing.
34 CentristNYer // Dec 4, 2009 at 2:00 pm
BarryS // Dec 4, 2009 at 1:54 pm
“I found the missing MI-GOPer. He was searching for his gonads somewhere in Detroit. He lost those important appendages sometime about 12.23 and has not found them.”
Are you sure he EVER had them, Barry?
35 ottovbvs // Dec 4, 2009 at 2:01 pm
PracticalGirl // Dec 4, 2009 at 1:25 pm
Otto:
Probably not any “box office records”. But propaganda producers aren’t after anyone new. This is simply a vertical marketing technique designed only to speak to those who already believe it and just want to hear it again at the MOVIES!!”
…..sure it’s preaching to the choir but it’s not going to bring any new adherents is it?
36 CentristNYer // Dec 4, 2009 at 2:02 pm
But wait, BarryS — you’re me and I’m you and we’re both Otto and ten others and we’re really just sock puppets for Nancy Pelosi.
Damn, I’m so confused…
37 LFC // Dec 4, 2009 at 2:06 pm
But wait, BarryS — you’re me and I’m you and we’re both Otto and ten others and we’re really just sock puppets for Nancy Pelosi.
To quote an old line:
Roses are red.
Violets are blue.
I’m a schizophrenic,
And so am I.
38 BarryS // Dec 4, 2009 at 2:17 pm
“But wait, BarryS — you’re me and I’m you and we’re both Otto and ten others and we’re really just sock puppets for Nancy Pelosi.
Damn, I’m so confused…”
I was Otto last night, Balcon this morning, guess I will be you later and practical girl at dinner…. All this typing in different threads all at the same time sure is hard.
39 BarryS // Dec 4, 2009 at 2:33 pm
HMM looks like the powers that be do not wish us to know that there are birthers here. Wonder why?
40 MI-GOPer // Dec 4, 2009 at 2:39 pm
BarryS, you’re part of the multiple named troll tribe that balconesfault uses to manage the threads and appear the discussion is 100% far Left, anti-Bush all the time. You know that. You’ve never been as addled brained as Otto. Otto’s schtick is to just irritate and try to sound faux-European. I think he’s claimed to have more lives and lived in more places than a bedbug on RosieODonnell’s back.
I’ve never thought of you as a sock puppet. For that, you’d need your own original thoughts.
41 BarryS // Dec 4, 2009 at 3:00 pm
Welcome back Birther boy.
You found your gonads yet?
Ok then Mi-Goper just answer one straight question as three are so hard for you.
Was the President born in the USA Yes/NO
Pretty simple question, should not need a great deal of research or thought.
Give it to me birther boy.
42 CentristNYer // Dec 4, 2009 at 3:04 pm
Barry, don’t rush him — he’s waiting to hear what the voices in his head tell him.
43 BarryS // Dec 4, 2009 at 3:17 pm
Yep, Cent. It’s only taken 4 hours for him to think up an answer for a yes/no question. I did get a no to the question was the president born in the USA but it was he now says ambiguous ( No can be ambiguous I guess!) so I ma asking again in plain language so there is no question what he believes.
44 Classing Up The Tea Parties // Dec 4, 2009 at 3:24 pm
[...] The Tea Party Documentary has premiered and it seems that the framing of the issue is perfect… unless you’ve actually followed the tea party movement. From my favorite conservative blog, FrumForum: [...]
45 MI-GOPer // Dec 4, 2009 at 3:49 pm
BarryS, joined by CentristNYer, and egged on by the twin dykes of PracticalGrrrl and txAnnie, bait: “Mi-Goper come in your time is up…”
So true in so many ways. I have answered your question, BarryS at least three times now and helped clarfiy for you what “no” means through all your childish tantrums and attention-grabbing highjinks. It matters not to you because, like you’ve done here repeatedly, slurring with gonads, coward and calling someone yellow is the best you can do on your better days. I’m gay, BarryS; we always know where our manhood lies.
It doesn’t help that your echo chambered pals egg you on as the short, dim-witted skewl boi bully with an oversized neck and a mouth that tries to write checks his brain & body can’t cash. But if you want to be their tool, so be it.
I answered you as I’ve volunteered an answer in the recent past when you were using the same issue to hammer someone else. It seems you can’t contain a simple answer –it might be that for you, like others in the echo chamber of the far Left here, simply drawing attention to yourself by being a pest is the ultimate goal of your time here… on this blog… the one about rebuilding the conservative movement and returning the GOP to its majority status.
Tantrums don’t help disavow the perception you’re junior-class dimwit, BarryS… or balconesfault… or Mr Face… or, what is the next troll up from the tribe?
46 CentristNYer // Dec 4, 2009 at 4:00 pm
BTW, while we’re on the topic of the birthers, did you see where the mayor of Arlington, TN posted a complaint on facebook that Obama’s speech pre-empted “A Charlie Brown Christmas,” thereby confirming that he’s really a Muslim?
http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2009/dec/04/mayor-fires-at-obama-online/
47 BarryS // Dec 4, 2009 at 4:03 pm
Please Mi-Gopher can you point me to the threads and the post number where you answered my question. I am aware of only one where you answered no to the question Was the President born in the USA.
Then you jumped off that particular bridge and retreated. I just want a simple answer to a simple question then I will leave you alone.
48 chinagreenelvis // Dec 4, 2009 at 5:34 pm
Fighting fire with fire, folks? Once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny… or at the very least FrumForum.
49 cpanza // Dec 4, 2009 at 6:23 pm
Elvis is right. Don’t take the bait. Many of the posters here, on all sides, make quality contributions to FF. Let’s tune out the noise and focus on signal.
You must log in to post a comment.