stay connected

FrumForum Facebook FrumForum YouTube Update Twitter FrumForum Flickr

Let’s Make A Deal

February 11th, 2009 at 6:24 am David Frum | 155 Comments |

| Print

The stimulus bill has passed Congress with almost no Republican votes: 3 in the Senate, 0 in the House.

Republicans hung tough, and the result is a bill that reflects Democratic goals – and pays off Democratic constituencies.

Probably that was the way the bill was going to turn out no matter what. If so, Republicans did not pay a big price for shunning the process.

But there’s a difference between “not paying a big price” and “winning an actual victory.”

These kinds of party line fights may energize Republicans in Congress and mobilize the dwindling Republican base. But in the aftermath, there is nothing but loss.

Between the changes to unemployment compensation – and Medicaid – and welfare – this bill adds up to the most important reshaping of the American welfare state since the middle 1960s. Republican views were not represented, Republican voices went unheard.

In consequence, some of the changes turned out worse than they had to (especially welfare) – and those changes that were positive (a federal subsidy to help laid-off workers continue to buy private-sector health insurance) are received by voters as purely Democratic achievements.

On the stimulus, these losses were unavoidable.

But next on the congressional docket are two huge issues where Republicans will need a very different strategy: health care and climate change.

On health care especially, Republicans need to wake up: a big reform is coming. It’s not 1993. The Clinton health plan came at a time when Democrats had less power (Clinton had won only 42% of the vote). In 1993, conservative Democrats like Louisiana’s Sen. John Breaux still held the balance of power in Congress. President Clinton made a series of elementary tactical blunders that Barack Obama will not repeat: Michelle will not be leading the healthcare task force this time. Above all: the mood of the country is much more bleak than it was in 1993. It’s corporate America as much as unions and activists that is demanding help now, and what corporate America wants, it usually gets.

If change is coming, Republicans need to be part of it. Health care change can be shaped in ways that are better or worse from a Republican point of view. We have red lines: no direct government delivery of health services. But we also have compromises we can live with: the amount of subsidy to the currently uninsured, for example.

The same is true on climate. Cap and trade that delivers big benefits to incumbent industries is obnoxious. A carbon tax that could replace the payroll tax should be very acceptable.

Once passed, the health and climate bills will be very difficult to alter. They will become part of the very structure of American society and economy, like Medicare or the home mortgage deduction. If these laws are written without reference to our views, they will reshape American society without reference to our views.

But if Republican views are to be heard, Republicans need to make a strategic decision for cooperation where possible.

Instead of the fantasy of another 1993 and 1994, we need the imagination to see a possibility for a different and better governing majority in this country – one that reflects the enterprise values of Republicans and moderate Democrats, not the welfare values of a Nancy Pelosi. As ever in Congress, though, you get only as much as you are prepared to give.

On the stimulus, we stood our ground – and got rolled right over. That will happen again and with much more disastrous effect with health and climate. It’s a new time and a new situation, and it calls for new methods.

Recent Posts by David Frum



155 Comments so far ↓

  • dragonlady

    So Chekote, HBill et all, is there room in the NewMajority for traditionalists? I would never try to impose any religious belief on anybody. At the same time, I’m tired of not being able to say Merry Christmas or having war memorials removed because a cross may be on it.

  • dragonlady

    Hbill, I don’t want CA’s economy or culture exported to the rest of the 50 states. The western states can elect the more socially moderate candidates and we can all be included as part of the Big Tent philosophy. The GOP shouldn’t expect the whole country to follow the south’s lead but it shouldn’t ignore it either.

  • HollywoodBill

    dragonlady–do not expect the Western libertarian based states to suppor a totally unacceptable candidate, like Sarah Palin or a Bobby Jindal. We have had enough of the socons in power with GWBush. But the socons are turning the big tent into a revival tent which is incapable of carrying any regions but the South and that’s not enough to win national elections.

  • Chekote

    Dragonlady, of course, there is room for traditionalists in the New Majority. Traditionalism is an essential part of the conservative movement. Among other things, conservatism is about prudent change. Russell Kirk said it best: “Change is essential to the body social, the conservative reasons, just as it is essential to the human body. A body that has ceased to renew itself has begun to die. But if that body is to be vigorous, the change must occur in a regular manner, harmonizing with the form and nature of that body; otherwise change produces a monstrous growth, a cancer, which devours its host. The conservative takes care that nothing in a society should ever be wholly old, and that nothing should ever be wholly new. This is the means of the conservation of a nation, quite as it is the means of conservation of a living organism. Just how much change a society requires, and what sort of change, depend upon the circumstances of an age and a nation.” Here is a link I think you will enjoy:
    http://www.kirkcenter.org/kirk/ten-principles.html

  • oodoodanoo

    I have to disagree (respectfully) with Mr. Frum and some of the posters here. Bill Clinton thought that he could avoid defeat by tacking to the center while ignoring his base. Well, it may have barely worked for him, but his party was drubbed in 1994. In other words, Americans weren’t fooled. When they wanted Republicans, they voted for them, and when they want Democrats, they’ll vote for them instead.

    The point is not to play to the here and now by playing catch-up with the Democrats. We need to look ahead to 2010 and 2012. When Americans see that this president is planning a radical attack on their values, they will wake up and get their priorities straight.

    Until then, playing ball with Obama will just serve to alienate those future faithful. They will not forget if the GOP turns to accommodation now.

Leave a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.