stay connected

FrumForum Facebook FrumForum YouTube Update Twitter FrumForum Flickr

GOP Must Make School Vouchers a Civil Rights Issue

September 2nd, 2009 at 1:54 pm Henry Clay | 54 Comments |

| Print

When one-off events catch public officials flat-footed, the public often shows some understanding.

The start of the school year, however, and the need to schedule classes for students, are as predictable as August.  To have this annual exercise result in chaos and delay for 8,000 high school students in Prince George’s County, Maryland is a scandal and disgrace.

As reported at length by the Washington Post, the year began for 8,000 of the county’s 41,000 high school students without schedules.  Five days, later, 1,300 were still in limbo. It really is difficult to comprehend the scale of this ineptitude.  As one student explained on a Facebook page devoted to the matter:

We basically are going 2 school 4 no point wut so ever…we are wasting time going 2 are fake teachers and fake classes, doing fake work or nothing at all, for nothing at all.

When 20 percent of the county’s high school students are herded into cafeterias and gymnasiums, with teachers engaged in crowd control because students have no classes to attend, the essential functions of local government have broken down.

The greater scandal here is that this failure has almost certainly had an adverse impact on black students.  Prince George’s County may be home to the largest black middle class in the country, but among those high school students who had the start of their high school year ruined by administrative ineptitude, many were minority students who needed those extra few days of instruction and could ill afford thumb twiddling and busy work.

A collapse of governing responsibility, one with civil rights implications, just miles from the nation’s capitol — but will anyone at the federal level propose to do much about it?  We know that Democrats won’t cross the teachers’ unions.  What about Republicans?  Would they use this as an opportunity to promote vouchers for any of these students, betrayed by their school system?

Republicans are supporters of school vouchers as an economic concept. By enhancing parental choice and challenging the unions, they bring competition to the public school monopoly and improve outputs for the parent and child consumers.  And Republicans support state reforms and federal reform in the District of Columbia.

But where are the conservative conviction politicians in Washington who will use this situation to loudly demand justice, and promote school vouchers, for the poor kids in P.G. County?  As many have noted, the lack of access to a quality education is a civil rights issue, one that calls out for vouchers as an emergency measure for kids stuck in failing schools.  For any who doubt this, consider the account of Jessica Pinkney, a Prince George’s County high school junior, who told a Post reporter that two days after the school year began, she was finally moved to the cafeteria from the gym, because the cafeteria had air conditioning.  And then she was given an index card with the number 195 on it — her place in line to receive an academic schedule.  This should not happen in America, and when it does, the citizens under the thumb of the authorities responsible should be liberated from their dependence.

Unfortunately, it is unlikely that Republicans in Congress will take an aggressive stand for these helpless students and against a corrupt and wasteful bureaucracy incapable of executing even the most basic tasks with which it is charged.  Republican commitments to federalism and local authority caution against such a full-throttle embrace of federally funded school vouchers.  Republican orthodoxy on limited government doubts the legitimacy of involvement by Washington in these essentially local matters.  And the Republican understanding of the original Constitution demands a restrictive understanding of fundamental rights.

But as demonstrated in Maryland, vouchers can be an imperative of justice — one consistent with the GOP’s, and the nation’s, historic constitutional commitment to civil rights.

Next week Congress returns from its August recess.  We will hear a great deal from legislators on both sides of the aisle about their admiration for their friend Senator Ted Kennedy.  While not embracing his politics, Republicans should consider the man’s tactics and take on the Prince George’s debacle.  Kennedy spoke loudly and often in the pursuit of justice.  He rarely let an opportunity pass to remind Americans of those in danger of being left behind.  And over time, his moral arguments won adherents and drove the center of the debate in his direction.

Democrats should be ashamed that in the fights over school choice, they take the side of the unions over the little guy — the minority student in a failing school.  And if Republicans spoke on this issue with the frequency and passion that their late colleague devoted to his causes, they might find in a few years that they have achieved some legislative successes on school vouchers, begun to reestablish some trust with the black community, and rebranded the party as one committed to justice and civil rights.

Recent Posts by Henry Clay



54 Comments so far ↓

  • DFL

    escapevelocity, I very much agree with your attitude on post 49, especially the dehumanization concept. Much of the evil of history has been come about when people dehumanize other people. Witness the various holocausts of the 20th Century from what Nazi Germany perpetrated on the Jews to the abortion holocaust that exists to this very day.

  • sinz54

    escapevelocity:
    As regards abortion, was slavery not immoral and human right abuse, because it was legal at one time?
    Yes.
    But at one time, women also had few rights, not even the right to vote. Their place was in the home, to run the household and bear children, and that was it.

    Right now, the country is split down the middle between those who see being pro-choice as preserving an essential right of choice for women vs. those who see being pro-life as preserving the right to life of what they consider to be an unborn person. We don’t know as yet which way the nation will end up.

    It could turn out that that someday, preserving the right to life of an unborn person will be regarded as equivalent to freeing the slaves–just as good and just as important.

    But it could also turn out that someday, preserving the right to choose abortion will be regarded as equivalent to women suffrage–just as good and just as important.

  • EscapeVelocity

    So now you are equating mass murder to women’s suffrage? A great expansion of liberty and equality.

    While I certainly agree that people will justify human cruelty and see themselves as great humanitarians while doing so. Slavery is the a great example, those savage apes, were cared for and came to know the lord Jesus, under my benevolent care and guidance. That type of thing.

    There is a movement that will not be stopped, the voiceless have a voice, and for all those whose cause has been our concern, the work goes on, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die…

  • greg_barton

    Sure it will. All dreams die.

Leave a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.