Glenn Beck’s Anti-Wilson Crusade

April 14th, 2010 at 12:31 am David Frum | 55 Comments |

| Print

Michael Lind has a very smart piece up at about Glenn Beck’s polemical reinvention of American history, rx in which Woodrow Wilson is cast as anti-conservative public enemy #1.

Following Lind, prostate a historian could spend many entertaining hours debunking Glenn Beck. But why bother? Beck is not telling a (wrong) story about the past. He’s telling a story about the present. That’s the story that needs to be understood and assessed.

On first thought, healing it seems crazy that contemporary Tea Party conservatives would fulminate against Woodrow Wilson of all people. You hate big-spending social welfare programs? Blame Lyndon Johnson or (if you want to go bipartisan) Richard Nixon. You hate government regulation and judges who don’t protect private property? Blame Franklin Roosevelt.

And in fact, Johnson, Roosevelt and (sometimes) Nixon have until recently headed the conservative roll of villains.

But Wilson? That’s just weird. What sins against conservatism did President Wilson commit?

Yes, the Sixteenth (income tax) Amendment was ratified under Woodrow Wilson. But the thing was set in motion long before Wilson entered national politics. If you feel very strongly that the income tax is wrong, you should direct your complaint to William Howard Taft: He was the president who proposed the amendment to Congress. And when the revenues from the tax arrived after 1913, President Wilson and the 63rd Congress used them – not to fund social programs – but to replace tariff revenues. That’s a good thing from a free-market point of view, right?

Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act into law. Until the day before yesterday, that was also a good thing from a conservative point of view. (See Friedman, Milton, collected works of.)

Wilson was less hostile to big business than either Taft or Theodore Roosevelt. His racial views were deplorable, but they were a big improvement over, say, Andrew Jackson’s, of whom most conservatives still think at least moderately well. Certainly you can acquit Wilson of any hint of social radicalism: he hated communism and was even a late convert to women’s suffrage.

For sure there’s a lot to criticize in Woodrow Wilson’s management of the First World War. Wilson failed to prepare adequately for war. His chosen commander, John Pershing, refused to learn from the tragic experience of the British and other allies and thus got a lot of brave soldiers stupidly killed. And Wilson’s bungling of the peace was epic and notorious. Yet none of this is exactly the stuff of urgent current concern. Or is it?

Let me advance a theory as to what’s really going on … Upcoming.

Recent Posts by David Frum

55 Comments so far ↓

  • DFL

    Jackson was certainly a small-government conservative, at least for American citizens. Indians were not American citizens in the early 19th Century. They were foreign nations to be conquered so that America could grow.

  • Gramps

    Now I know Independentand Western Academic and others’, may not appreciate Olde Hickory’s bad arse attitude…

    However, as an olde soldier I appreciate and have a rather hardy, enthusiastic, lusty, affinity, for the discontinuity, mayhem and just his; plain, sorry, bad arse, attitude on general principles…!

    Some wag once said, he…jumped thru a closed window in the White House…to win a bet?

    That’s truly an exclamation point…!

  • Gramps

    DFL // Apr 15, 2010 at 5:18 pm wrote: Jackson was certainly a small-government conservative, at least for American citizens. Indians were not American citizens in the early 19th Century. They were foreign nations to be conquered so that America could grow.

    Jackson had his glaring faults…one, obviously was his attitude toward Native American’s…!

    I have no truck with him in that respect.
    I’m aware most can’t relate to his adventurous, wild side as a soldier…that’s the leadership detail that intrigues my thought…with all due regard for his unfortunate prejudices.

  • Must-Reads of the Week: Diabolical Republicans, Strategic Patience, Weiner, China, New York City, -20 Questions, & Glenn Beck’s Obsession With Woodrow Wilson - 2parse

    [...] Beck’s Woodrow Wilson Obsession. David Frum puzzles on why Glenn Beck focuses so much on Woodrow Wilson as the beginning point of all things progressive and source of evils in the modern world. There are so many more logical choices, more progressive [...]

  • Vermontah

    Beck is nuts. He needs to have a note pinned to his jacket and taken away