<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Jewboy Email: Let&#8217;s Go to the Tape!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frumforum.com/emailgate-conservative-group-claims-inconsistencies-in-nbcs-story/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frumforum.com/emailgate-conservative-group-claims-inconsistencies-in-nbcs-story</link>
	<description>Building a conservatism that can win again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:42:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NBC-ALG dispute at standstill; group isn&#8217;t producing more evidence &#124; Obama Biden White House</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/emailgate-conservative-group-claims-inconsistencies-in-nbcs-story/comment-page-1#comment-66266</link>
		<dc:creator>NBC-ALG dispute at standstill; group isn&#8217;t producing more evidence &#124; Obama Biden White House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=12935#comment-66266</guid>
		<description>[...] with Stone, where she allegedly first claimed to have not sent any email to the organization. Clews mentioned the taped phone call on New Majority.   Also, ALG declined my request to visit the group&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with Stone, where she allegedly first claimed to have not sent any email to the organization. Clews mentioned the taped phone call on New Majority.   Also, ALG declined my request to visit the group&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewSCconserv</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/emailgate-conservative-group-claims-inconsistencies-in-nbcs-story/comment-page-1#comment-66045</link>
		<dc:creator>NewSCconserv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 03:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmajority.com/?p=12935#comment-66045</guid>
		<description>I see two big logical problems with ALG&#039;s position:
1-I find it hard to believe(actually impossible) that NBC wouldn&#039;t cut bait with the producer if they found out that she did send that &quot;bite me jew boy&quot; email. Covering up for her would be a much bigger story than if she actually sent that email. Especially with so many employees at NBC, it would be a matter of time before a copy of the supposed &quot;bite me jewboy&quot; server email leaked out, yet they&#039;re standing by Stone(and since it was a supposedly sent on a blackberry, RIM would have a copy also, so double the number of people who could leak the supposed email). 

2-&quot;Bite me jewboy&quot; makes absolutely zero logical sense as a response to the mass email ALG sent out, unless ALG isn&#039;t showing all the emails that were sent to her before she said that(which would undermine their credibility).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see two big logical problems with ALG&#8217;s position:<br />
1-I find it hard to believe(actually impossible) that NBC wouldn&#8217;t cut bait with the producer if they found out that she did send that &#8220;bite me jew boy&#8221; email. Covering up for her would be a much bigger story than if she actually sent that email. Especially with so many employees at NBC, it would be a matter of time before a copy of the supposed &#8220;bite me jewboy&#8221; server email leaked out, yet they&#8217;re standing by Stone(and since it was a supposedly sent on a blackberry, RIM would have a copy also, so double the number of people who could leak the supposed email). </p>
<p>2-&#8221;Bite me jewboy&#8221; makes absolutely zero logical sense as a response to the mass email ALG sent out, unless ALG isn&#8217;t showing all the emails that were sent to her before she said that(which would undermine their credibility).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
