stay connected

FrumForum Facebook FrumForum YouTube Update Twitter FrumForum Flickr

Don’t Fear the Option (Yet)

November 3rd, 2009 at 4:59 pm Eli Lehrer | 5 Comments |

| Print

The passage of a sweeping healthcare reform bill sometime before the end of 2010 seems likely and, given the overwhelming Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress, whatever bill ends up on President Obama’s desk will probably include a government-backed plan — a public option — that has become a holy grail to many Democrats.  By itself, the idea of a government-run health plan for people who aren’t poor, disabled, young, or old ought to raise eyebrows amongst anyone who believes that government ought to reserve public help for needy people willing to help themselves.  But predictions from the Right that a public option will result in overnight healthcare socialism also appear overstated. Quite simply, the most politically plausible versions of the public option will seem small enough to start with that the real battles over a government takeover will take place sometime in the future.

To begin with, a government-run plan that negotiated rates on the same basis as private insurers rather than imposing them by government fiat — the only version that seems to have the votes to pass both houses this year — probably wouldn’t have large immediate consequences. In fact, a recent Congressional Budget Office report indicates that only about 6 million Americans (2 percent of the population) would sign up for this type of plan.  Other options with some legitimate chance of passing Congress — government-subsidized health co-ops and a public plan that states have to join—would have similar short-term results.

And, although Medicare and Medicaid both quickly busted their budgets, examples from other insurance markets show growth isn’t inevitable. All states maintain “residual” auto insurance markets for people unable to get insurance elsewhere. For years, these plans grew out of control and, in a few places, they remain large.  But, since about 1990 dozens of states have shrunk their residual auto insurance markets to sizes that, literally, can be counted on one hand. In many urbanized states — Illinois, Ohio, and New York — similar plans created to provide property insurance in the wake of 1960s riots and 1970s arson sprees have also shrunk themselves almost out of existence. (These plans, however, have continued to grow at a rapid rate in hurricane-prone areas.) In health terms, it’s true that these residual markets have much more in common with high risk health insurance pools than the public options before Congress. Nonetheless, the ability to downsize them in much of the country shows that government run-or mandated insurance isn’t always a political third rail and won’t always grow out of control.

In the short term, conservatives have plenty of reasons to dislike the idea of a public health care option. At the same time, however, the reasonably modest proposals currently before Congress won’t, by themselves, result in a government healthcare takeover. Even if liberals get a small-scale public option, many battles over government control of healthcare will still lie ahead.

Recent Posts by Eli Lehrer



5 Comments so far ↓

  • prm79

    If a 1990 page bill doesn’t scare you then you are in the wrong party. Even 1 page more of health care bureaucracy is too much.

    That 230 page GOP bill looks pretty good. It reduces governement meddling. How about that?
    http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BO6PQO1&show_article=1

  • LFC

    Well the overview of the GOP bill pretty much looks like it doesn’t do a thing to help the healthcare crisis. Tort reform and allowing insurance companies cross state lines (which will result in consolidating health insurance to a handful of giant insurers) and a few other things.

    No universal care. No help for those with pre-existing conditions. More profits for biggest insurers and less accountability for healthcare providers. Sounds like a GOP plan to me.

  • SFTor1

    I just came back from a retreat for men with cancer (I help out.) Out of 11 men, 6 had declared bankruptcy. Do you think those guys were first and foremost worried about tort reform?

    prm79 does not want to consider that the current health care situation is destroying our communities from the inside. Free-market BS has eaten his brain.

  • sinz54

    LFC: Well the overview of the GOP bill pretty much looks like it doesn’t do a thing to help the healthcare crisis.
    There is no healthcare “crisis.”

    The problems in healthcare right now are exactly the same problems we had last year, 5 years ago, 10 years ago, etc.

    In 1993, the Dem line was also that we were in a healthcare “crisis.” Then after HillaryCare got shot down in Congress, the Dems stopped using the word “crisis.”

  • sinz54

    prm79: That 230 page GOP bill looks pretty good. It reduces governement meddling. How about that?
    Under the GOP plan, I would be facing bankruptcy and going on welfare.

    I’ve got kidney failure, I’m on dialysis (over $60,000 a year), and I’m too ill to work, so I no longer have employer-provided group insurance. And in many states, no individual insurer will touch me with a ten foot pole because they know how expensive that pre-existing condition can be.

    What, if anything, would the GOP plan do to ease my burden?

Leave a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.