In the extremely lethal overseas environment post 9/11, the role of private security contractors has expanded from guard forces to services outside the perimeter, such as Personal Security Details (PSDs) for diplomats, etc. It is this security function that has generated controversy.
Amongst the general public there is a great deal of confusion regarding the practice of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) contracting out logistics and security services. Although largely viewed as a phenomena of the post-9/11 conflicts in the Middle East, the practice is not new.
Traditionally providing supplies and materiel, private contractors have been involved with the U.S. military since the Revolution. Following the end of the first Gulf War, the DoD contracted Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown & Root Services (KBR) to study the use of private military forces with American soldiers in combat zones. The rationale was to free up military personnel for the pure military mission by contracting out services such as running mess halls, service functions such as garbage collection, etc, and base security.
Modern security professionals have been referred to in the media as “mercenaries”. This is a derogatory reference, and is inaccurate; a mercenary sells his services to the highest bidder – a purely mercantile relationship – and their activities may cover the entire operational spectrum, outside of legal constraints. In serving the U.S. DoD overseas, independent contractors are limited to a defensive role, and – contrary to commonly-held belief – are fully accountable under U.S. and international law.
There is an unwritten code of ethics amongst security professionals; we are not criminals or “soldiers of fortune”. Amongst my colleagues, an operator who conducts himself as some kind of flamboyant gunslinger is regarded as a potential loose cannon, to be avoided.
We possess a unique skill set and we perform a vital service. Like professional athletes, we are paid exactly what we are worth and it is never enough – for example: try to get a life insurance policy in this line of work.
Currently the largest of the U.S. State Department’s three private security contractors, Xe Services LLC is a privately owned security services firm founded as Blackwater USA in 1997 by Erik Prince and Al Clark. Erik Prince previously served as a Navy SEAL officer on deployments to Haiti, the Middle East, and the Mediterranean, including Bosnia.
In Iraq, Blackwater became poster boys for excess. A “photo cartoon” circulating in Baghdad among security contractors and some U.S. soldiers – and the laughter it generated – speaks for itself:
“Blackwater has become a symbol of testosterone-fueled excess,” one security contractor stated, who like most remains unnamed because the industry is under such scrutiny.
In February 2009 Blackwater USA, was renamed “Xe”, reflecting a change in company focus away from the business of providing private security. A company spokesman stated that it was felt the Blackwater name was too closely associated with the company’s work in the occupation of Iraq.
Based in North Carolina, Xe operates a tactical training facility which the company claims is the world’s largest, and at which it trains more than 40,000 people a year, mostly from the U.S. and other military and police services. The training consists of military offensive and defensive operations, as well as smaller scale personal security.
Of the 987 contractors Xe provides, 744 are U.S. citizens. Xe has provided security services in Iraq to the United States federal government, particularly the Central Intelligence Agency on a contractual basis. They no longer have a license to operate in Iraq: the new Iraqi government made multiple attempts to expel them from their country, and denied their application for an operating license in January 2009.
Based in Alexandria, Virginia, MPRI is a private military contractor that provides a wide range of services to both public and private customers, most notably the U.S. DoD. MPRI specializes in various professions such as law enforcement, security, military training, logistics, etc. By its own account MPRI operates in over 40 countries.
A member of International Peace Operations Association (IPOA), MPRI was founded in 1987 by eight retired officers of the U.S. Army. In June of 2000 MPRI was acquired by L-3 Communications.
Triple Canopy is a private military contracting company headquartered in Herndon, Virginia that provides global security and risk management services in North America, South America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Africa, and the Middle East. The company’s website claims that it delivers “a broad range of security and risk management services including assessments, training, crisis management, protective, and support services.”
Triple Canopy was founded in 2003, and it is best known for its work in the Iraq War. Since April of 2009 the Obama administration signed contracts for Triple Canopy to work in the Middle East.
The name Triple Canopy was initially chosen to refer to the layered canopy jungle of Southeast Asia and Central America, where some of the key founding members received their military training and operational experience; it also refers to the distinction among U.S. Army personnel of wearing the Airborne, Ranger, and Special Forces tabs, if authorized, when assigned to Special Forces units.
Under the tab “Careers” the Triple Canopy website proclaims, “Quiet Professionals Wanted”. Quiet Professionals is a military buzzword that specifically implies U.S. Army Special Forces soldiers (Green Berets). It is rumored that leadership at Triple Canopy has roots from the 1st Special Forces Operational Detachment – Delta (commonly referred to as Delta Force).
CACI International Inc founded in 1962, is a professional services and information technology (IT) company headquartered in Arlington, Virginia. A member of the Fortune 1000 Largest Companies, CACI has approximately 12,700 employees in over 120 offices in the U.S. and Europe.
Abu Ghraib Controversy
In 2004, CACI was linked to the Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse along with another U.S. government contractor, Titan Corp (now owned by L-3 Communications). 2 CACI employees were investigated in the Taguba inquiry. The U.S. Army found that “contractors were involved in 36 percent of the (Abu Ghraib) proven incidents” and identified six employees as “individually culpable”, although none have faced prosecution.
CACI Response:
According to CACI’s website, “the company provided a range of Information Technology (IT) and intelligence services in Iraq. These services included intelligence analysis, background investigations, screenings, interrogation, property management and recordkeeping, and installation of computer systems, software and hardware. Only a small portion of these employees worked as interrogators. The company states that “no CACI employee or former employee has been indicted for any misconduct in connection with this work, and no CACI employee or former employee appears in any of the photos released from Abu Ghraib”.
CACI interrogation services in Iraq concluded in the early fall of 2005 upon the conclusion of a contract with the Department of the Army.
In 2007 CACI acquired Wexford Group International:
Operating from offices in the southeastern and midwestern U.S., Wexford offers management consulting services to the federal government (including the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Army, and various other U.S. Department of Defense agencies), as well as clients in the private sector. Its services cover acquisition management, organizational and performance management, risk mitigation, strategic communications, and tactical training.
Sean Linnane is not employed by any of the companies mentioned in this article.
Originally posted at STORMBRINGER.










































sinz54 // Jan 2, 2010 at 2:14 pm
As part of their contract with the military, were these contractors required to obey the military rules of engagement?
Military Police (MP) guards are still military, and have to obey rules of engagement, the Geneva Conventions, etc. They can’t shoot a prisoner in cold blood, they can’t shoot civilians, etc.
Were any such constraints put on these contractors?
JeninCT // Jan 2, 2010 at 11:15 pm
Thanks for a very informative piece. As one with a ‘quiet professional’ in my family, I can tell you I am sick of hearing these personnel referred to as mercenaries. I’m also tired of people saying “Haliburton” when referring to Cheney and the Bush administration as if it were a curse word. They have no clue. These groups of brave men will do work no one else will.
COProgressive // Jan 3, 2010 at 1:11 pm
Although war for profit has been going on for ages, and one of the “benefits” of war and the chaos it brings is the blinder where money is concerned as evidenced by the Billions of dollars in cash that disappeared into the sands of Iraq.
As part of that “benefit” of war are the now infamous “No-Bid” contracts let to companies with influence which is little less than giving the contracting companies the key to the Treasury. “Cost plus” contracts where the contractor gets more “Plus” the more “Cost” they can add to the bill.
As to the mercenaries…… errr excuse me…… PSD’s, they are putting OUR country onto a slippery slope, along with the “Volunteer Army”, towards “Privatizing” war. No longer with the American people have to send their sons and daughter into harms way to “Defend” OUR country. If we go down the slippery slope, soon all US fighting forces will be made up of “Privatized” individuals willing to fight, not for love of country or the Defense of OUR country, but for the almight BUCK!
If we are to be a warrior country, bring back the draft and force all Americans put their sons and daughters on the tip of the sword.
“History teaches that war begins when governments believe the price of aggression is cheap.” – Ronald Reagan
JeninCT // Jan 3, 2010 at 4:26 pm
COprogressive: “If we go down the slippery slope, soon all US fighting forces will be made up of “Privatized” individuals willing to fight, not for love of country or the Defense of OUR country, but for the almight BUCK!”
Our forces are paid for their service. That’s the reason many enlist, besides love of country. For many, service includes an education and the beginning of a terrific career path. Some in the service see the gaps and move to fill them, just like any other businessman. Many are former special forces ops. These men are well trained and wish to use their training and skills in the private sector. Do you begrudge former cops who start security firms as well?
balconesfault // Jan 3, 2010 at 9:29 pm
What has been the impact on our senior military leadership as these jobs are outsourced? How many of our best trained and most experienced non-coms and officers are running around making money for Erik Prince instead of providing leadership to guys on their first tour of duty? Who was the Secretary of Defense who authored the downsizing of the military and outsourcing of military fuctions … and where does Erik Prince’s campaign contributions go after his company experienced years of 600 percent growth through the 00’s?
JeninCT // Jan 4, 2010 at 5:35 pm
“What has been the impact on our senior military leadership as these jobs are outsourced? How many of our best trained and most experienced non-coms and officers are running around making money for Erik Prince instead of providing leadership to guys on their first tour of duty”
That’s a valid question, balconesfault. I think the shrinking military began relying more on contingency contractors in the 90’s, although they were never ‘no bid’ contracts, and the ‘cost plus’ percentages were in line with standard industry practices.
tdawg11870 // Jan 4, 2010 at 7:02 pm
This reads like a “Special Advertising Section” for these companies, complete with logos. You could be a little more sly.
balconesfault // Jan 4, 2010 at 7:07 pm
I think the shrinking military began relying more on contingency contractors in the 90’s
And that was not by coincidence – that was exactly the long term strategy mapped out by Dick Cheney as SecDef – his plan was to reduce military strength by the mid-1990s to 1.6 million, compared to 2.2 million in 1989 when he took over. Of course, doing that means that a lot of jobs traditionally performed by our military during conflict – from building facilities (traditionally done by the Army Corps of Engineers) to slinging slop in the mess hall to standing guard at domestic military bases and foreign embassies – would have to be handled by contractors.
All at a nice markup, of course.