The difference is pretty clear to all but those who fight to focus in on the real issues –like BS-boi.

…….another contribution from the Emily Post of the Soo

I don’t think I did, BS-boi… but then you are reality-challenged as a troll, no?

Thank you for admitting that Obama & the Democrats lied when promising Americans that they would be able to bring NATO and our allies to Afghanistan’s “War of Necessity” and help relieve American troops of the burdens of war and the nearly complete responsibility for combat operations.

It’s such a huge improvement over the Bush Era of CowBoy Diplomacy that you and your fellow far Left pals cried about for 4 yrs.

Oh wait, Obama didn’t get jack from the allies or NATO as he promised? The Democrats are getting ready to cut & run from Afghanistan too? We’re giving the terrorists unlimited access to worldwide media while they visit Manhattan?

Please, BS-boi, say hello to Alice in Wonderland when you run into her in your version of reality.

The difference is pretty clear to all but those who fight to focus in on the real issues –like BS-boi.

“sinz: We will have won the War on Terror when we can go back to living the way we did before 9-11: No shoe inspections at airports. No PATRIOT Acts. No turning our political conventions into armed camps.

Sorry. We will never get back there. Period. Isn’t going to happen.’

……..Sinz says the darndest things at times……this was another beaut for the collection

……As I said you don’t understand the difference…..thanks for proving it

‘The question of WHETHER we should be escalating in Afghanistan is a separate topic from how we pay for whatever effort is made there.’

……..Obviously you’ve never heard of cost/benefit analysis

Obviously, sinz54, you don’t agree with the Obama Administration in going back to treating all these terror threats as just law enforcement matters? Eric Stedman –I mean Eric Holder– says it is a law enforcement matter now for the civilian courts to work out. Of course, it doesn’t help his old law firm is protecting several of the terrorists and providing legal counsel for them to get off scot-free.

Plus, the Obama declared the War on Terror is over in his WorldWide Apology Tour stop in Cairo… how can there still be terror threats? We’ve read it here on this blog… some Democrats think it’s Russia’s and India’s job to police the terror threat in Pakistan. Not America’s.

Thousands of miles from America… what’s to worry about? I think you’re just stuck on fear-mongering; relax… the economy is nearly rebounded thanks to the Stimulus Spending Spree! Be happy. Vote Democrat.

Sorry. We will never get back there. Period. Isn’t going to happen.

Sorry automaticBS, that wasn’t the point. Nice spin, though. Been taking notes on how BlankHead does it, have you?

The point was Obama and the Democrats ran on a pledge that they COULD get our allies to pony-up, man-up in this “War of Necessity” –as your own president called it.

Now, we learn he can’t. We saw him botch relations with allies like England. We saw him botch relations with allies like the French so badly that now the French look resolute and tough compared to Obama. Ouch, that hurts a lot; where is our national pride?? Obama has pissed off the Czechs after they stuck out their political necks for us. Obama has pissed off the Poles after they, too, stuck out their necks for us and our interests.

And Pakistan questions American intent and resolve when asking for their help against alQaeda and we dispatch Madam Hillary to lecture them on catching Osama bin Laden?

Wow. The days of CowBoy Diplomacy under Geo Bush 43 are looking pretty damn good by comparison.