Did CPAC Invite the Wrong Gay Group?

January 11th, 2011 at 3:18 pm | 15 Comments |

| Print

The gay conservative group GOProud scored a big political win over its most dangerous rival last week.  No, I’m not referring to their social conservative adversaries.  I’m referring to the more relevant and less conservative group that GOProud splintered away from: the Log Cabin Republicans.

This is nothing new.  At last year’s CPAC conference, GOProud did exactly as it has done this year, creating a stir by signing on to co-sponsor the annual gathering.  Rather than taking a firm stance on its right to be at the conference, the GOProud leaders took the opportunity to whack LCR as regularly as possible.  Jimmy LaSalvia told Hot Air’s Ed Morrisey that “as you may know, GOProud was founded by a former member of the Log Cabin Republicans who left the group because he thought they were doing a disservice to their constituency by not adhering to conservative and Republican principles.”

This year, many social conservative groups are up in arms over GOProud’s return to CPAC, yet the Log Cabin Republicans are conspicuously absent from this entire CPAC fiasco.  Why?

The founders of GOProud made a calculated decision to get their name into the public eye and the debate over sponsoring CPAC allowed them to do so at a time when Log Cabin Republicans was floundering.  But GOProud may have hitched its wagon to the wrong movement, and at times the wrong candidate.  In a September 2010 story on the group, Ben Smith quotes one of GOProud’s founders as saying “We’re Joe Miller; Log Cabin is Lisa Murkowski.”  We all know how that turned out, with Murkowski winning reelection and voting to repeal DADT. (During the vote on DADT, GOProud praised the votes of Senators Mark Kirk and Scott Brown, but was silent on Murkowski and other GOP senators it did not endorse.)

The LCR v. GOProud “feud” has gone much the same way as the Alaska Senate race. If GOProud’s star was on the rise at this time last year, this year it is much more desperate for attention.  LCR spearheaded the lawsuit which led a federal judge to overturn DADT and it played a vocal role in pushing Republicans to support repealing DADT.  Its new executive director, R. Clarke Cooper, became a regular guest on cable news over the course of the year.  Under his leadership, LCR probably helped deliver the biggest year that gay Republicans have ever had.

Charles Moran, former national spokesman for Log Cabin Republicans and principle at CTM consulting spoke to FrumForum.  Moran pointed out that: “GOProud needs the publicity because otherwise, it really isn’t very relevant.  It does not have a presence on Capitol Hill and it does not have a membership base.” LCR still retains the structural advantages that make it more difficult for GOProud to remain nationally relevant.  LCR has a PAC, a significant membership base, a fixed headquarters, and a handful of in-house lobbyists to push its agenda on Capitol Hill.

GOProud does not have these advantages so it must get creative to stay relevant.  The group finds its way into the headlines in ways that raise fair questions about their goals.  For instance, in September of 2010, the group booked none other than Ms. Discrimination herself, Ann Coulter, to speak at a $2,500 a plate fundraiser in New York.  To a crowd of her gay fans, Coulter stated that “I don’t care how many studies Ted Olson produces” and that the ideal is “one mother, one father.”  GOProud’s founders were quick to defend Coulter’s right to disagree with those who support gay marriage, but its hard to deny that she was an odd choice to speak for the group. Coulter is the same woman who went on national television (on Hannity and Colmes in 2007) to argue that “[f]aggot isn’t offensive to gays; it has nothing to do with gays. It’s a schoolyard taunt meaning ‘wuss.’”

Regarding the controversy over CPAC, Moran noted that:

The Tea Party really drove the Republican Revolution of 2010 and the Tea Party really does not focus on social issues.  They are all about the economy and getting America moving again.  The big, very focused social conservative advocacy groups like Liberty University realize that social issues are not a part of the Tea Party and are therefore going to be less important to mainstream Republican politics as we go forward. This fight is really about these socially conservative groups desperately trying to stay relevant.

Conservatives tolerate GOproud precisely because they know the group won’t actually push them to address substantive issues involving gay rights.  GOProud’s motto might as well be: “Gays should not ask what the Republican Party can do for them. Gays should ask what they can do for the Republican Party.” But for those gay conservatives who would like their organization to speak for their own interests too, little is to be gained at an event like CPAC.  LCR realizes, I suspect, that it doesn’t need to fight such public wars as the tides of progress flow in a pro-gay direction. LCR’S absence from CPAC is a sign of LCR’s strength. GOProud may have provoked social conservatives into a petulant and self-destructive display, but CPAC remains as hostile as ever to a gay civil rights agenda. GOProud’s participation does nothing to correct that offense.


Recent Posts by Jeb Golinkin



15 Comments so far ↓

  • dafyd

    To answer your question, yes. GOproud are a bunch greedy, sellouts. Inviting the queen of “do or say anything for money” Ann Coulter to their fundraiser is enough prove of that.

  • DFL

    I won’t take the bait on which “conservative” homosexual group CPAC should invite but I will take the bait on David Keene being a money-grubbing flim-flam man who is for sale to the highest bidder. One of the few positive things about being fifty years of age is that I remember one David Keene selling out conservatives and Ronald Reagan in 1980 and attaching himself to George “Poppy” Bush’s presidential campaign although Bush made it clear that movement conservatives would have no role in a Bush Administration. And they didn’t, albeit eight years later.

  • Emanuelle

    Another way to put it would be: is CPAC still relevant in any shape or form?

    I mean, these are the people who had Rush Limbaugh and a barely pubescent kid as keynote speakers last year.

  • Houndentenor

    Has GOProud taken any stands on gay rights? They seem to only endorse candidates who are completely against any rights for gay people.

  • moderategoper

    The problem with LCR – It’s lost all connections to the grassroots of the party.

    Most people don’t know what the hell there doing anymore accept for the occasional email blast, they send out. They have a boring blog which is rarely updated. They have no youth component, which is ironic given that many GOP youth support gay rights.

    LCR has an image problem, and until they deal with this they will have problems down the road. They need to appeal to youth, libertarians and centrist Republicans. But they need to do this on grassroots level. Goproud is nothing more than an outgrowth of the popular Gay Patriot blog. They need to take their social networks and blog more seriously, these are the most powerful tools they have – not there insider relationships on The Hill.

  • Mitch Daniels inclusion at CPAC draws criticism from conservative groups – The Washington Independent | Conservatives for America

    [...] Ticker (blog)Social Conservatives Protest Gay Republicans at CPAC GatheringPolitically IllustratedFrumForum -Reason Online (blog) -msnbc.comall 15 news [...]

  • ktward

    GOProud’s motto might as well be: “Gays should not ask what the Republican Party can do for them. Gays should ask what they can do for the Republican Party.”

    Yep. That nicely sums it up.
    - LCR is a gay GOP group whose mission is furthering LGBT rights.
    - GOProud is a group of outed GOP gays whose mission is–for nothing more constructive than grins and giggles, it seems–to push the buttons of the SoCons/Religious Right.

    Personally, I don’t have a problem with GOProud. ‘Enemy of my enemy’ kind of thing.
    But clearly they’re not at all interested in furthering LGBT rights–or fostering GOP tolerance–any more than my local knitting group.

  • ktward

    The problem with LCR – It’s lost all connections to the grassroots of the party.

    The overarching problem with LCR, in terms of its effectiveness, is its party allegiance. REP suffers from the same malady.

  • GOP Rep. Jim Jordan Also Boycotting CPAC – TPMDC | Conservatives for America

    [...] knocked for inviting Mitch DanielsCNN Political Ticker (blog)Politically Illustrated -FrumForum -Reason Online (blog)all 16 news [...]

  • jakester

    I disagree with the concept there is no relation between teabaggers and social conservatives. My take on baggers is that they are mainly fundamentalist attempting politics; with the Founding Fathers standing in for biblical heroes and the Constitution standing in for the Bible. GOProud is to gays like Thomas Sowell and Alan Keyes are to blacks, an acceptable bunch of tokens guaranteed to promote the party line first.

  • Houndentenor

    @moderategoper I can’t think of any national gay advocacy group that is in touch with the grass roots of anything. It’s why Human Rights Campaign is effective at nothing but throwing lavish parties for big donors.

  • CPAC and ‘conservative’ swingers – WND.com | Conservatives for America

    [...] Jim Jordan Also Boycotting CPACTPMDCCNN Political Ticker (blog) -Politically Illustrated -FrumForumall 13 news [...]

  • Truth Wins Out - David Frum on the Fractured Gay Republican Movement

    [...] is kind of a damning piece, all the way around. Jeb Golinkin at FrumForum addresses the differences between GOProud and the Log Cabin Republicans, and in a way, exposes just how bigoted groups like [...]

  • joshfarmer76

    The gay-mariage issue is a losing issue for the GOP unless they redefine the argument from pro/con gay marriage to whether government should be invovled in the marriage licensing business in the first place. By granting government the right to license marriage as it does hunting and driver’s licenses, one ultimately gives government the same power to take those licenses away. Anything government gives it can take away. It’s time to support the Government-Free Marriage movement and solve the many problems associated with government’s encroachment into private individuals’ lives.. Government-Free Marriage, an idea who’s time has come. http://www.governmentfreemarriage.com

  • Battle of the Gay Conservatives - Big Tent Revue

    [...] Frum Forum’s Jeb Gonklin wrote a great post a while back on the differences between the two gay conservative groups: Log Cabin Republicans and GOProud.  Since I’ve been involved with Log Cabin for almost a decade, my sympathies lie with them.  Gonklin does a good job of describing what both groups have done in the last year, and Gonklin seems to have little good to say about GOProud.  Regarding the latest controversy regarding the Conservative Political Action Conference and GOProud’s role, Gonklin has this to say: Conservatives tolerate GOproud precisely because they know the group won’t actually push them to address substantive issues involving gay rights.  GOProud’s motto might as well be: “Gays should not ask what the Republican Party can do for them. Gays should ask what they can do for the Republican Party.” But for those gay conservatives who would like their organization to speak for their own interests too, little is to be gained at an event like CPAC.  LCR realizes, I suspect, that it doesn’t need to fight such public wars as the tides of progress flow in a pro-gay direction. LCR’S absence from CPAC is a sign of LCR’s strength. GOProud may have provoked social conservatives into a petulant and self-destructive display, but CPAC remains as hostile as ever to a gay civil rights agenda. GOProud’s participation does nothing to correct that offense. [...]