Comments on: Democrats Link Tea Party to Republicans

By: drdredel

drdredel — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:05:26 +0000

Leave poor nh alone. You have no idea what hardship he had to overcome to be able to string words together into semi coherant sentences. Not everyone has the benefit of an IQ over 50 you know!

By: busboy33

busboy33 — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:55:04 +0000

Am I?

Look mommy! NH said I was perfect!!

Thanks. You’re extra-special too!

(btw, the rhyming? Awesome.)

By: GEValle

GEValle — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:50:01 +0000

I wish the Republicans would link the TEA PARTY to the Republicans…

By: rbottoms

rbottoms — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:27:19 +0000

Governing is for p******s, let’s start with the hangings!

By: balconesfault

balconesfault — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:23:12 +0000

NH proves that the Tea Party message is best conveyed with screaming, terse sentences filled with hyperbolic accusations, and invective.

It comes off a little worse for wear when you quit using all-caps and try to explain exactly how the Tea Partiers would govern in a comprehensive manner.

By: NH

NH — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:16:53 +0000

busboy33 is an example, a perfect one, of the clueless ignoramuses in this country!

By: NH

NH — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:15:56 +0000

OH by the way, if anyone is linked with those nasty tea partiers who just would like smaller, more honest, and solvent government, heaven forbid!

THIS IS FAR SUPERIOR THAN TO HAVE THE END OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY AND THE COMMUNIST TERRORISTS IN POWER AS WE HAVE NOW!

Can you say Democratic Socialist Caucus?

My God… since when is the Constitution something scandalous but having your whole Dem party taken over by murderous nazi socialists NOT????

By: NH

NH — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:13:38 +0000

HO HUM DAVID FRUM SPREADING FUD, what a DUD!

Yeah like you leak out your strategy before you actually tell the lie?

And Frum is all too willing to go along with it.

People didn’t buy the astroturf, racism, or old rich people accusations and they aren’t buying this either.

FRUM, you need to quit writing or at least stop calling yourself a ‘journalist’.

By: busboy33

busboy33 — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:09:07 +0000

And WHY the concerted and repeated attempts to remove a duly-elected President?

I mean, its definittely not because he’s Black. We’ve established that.

So what else about him is unique when compared to the other Presidents that have all come before him, so unique that it merits such a unique response from the opposition? I mean, trying to surreptitiously slip in retroactive citizenship nullification, specifically and explicitly targeted for the sole purpose of getting rid of Obama? Pretty serious. So what merits that?

Aside frome the Black thing, I mean. Cuz its not that. That would be silly.

p.s.: They DO realize that the rule couldn’t be ex post facto, so it would have absolutely no effect of Obama’s citizenship, right?

p.p.s.: So when Bill Gates receives a Lifetime Achievement from the British Telecommunications Industry . . . are we kicking him (and his gazillions of dollars in capital) out? M0re buisnessmen get “foreign awards” than politicians — get those buisnessmen!

By: balconesfault

balconesfault — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:56:21 +0000

“if any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain any title of nobility or honor” from a “foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen”

Did these Einsteins consider that this would, well, deny citizenship to any future Einsteins?

We know that the Texas Republican Party Platform (which calls for outlawing sodomy, strip clubs, and all pornography) is loony tunes. Now Iowa joins them. Who’s next?