<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Note to Readers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frumforum.com/a-note-to-readers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frumforum.com/a-note-to-readers</link>
	<description>Building a conservatism that can win again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:50:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: When you&#8217;re &#8220;more seasoned&#8230;&#8221; &#171; DC Works</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/a-note-to-readers/comment-page-1#comment-71457</link>
		<dc:creator>When you&#8217;re &#8220;more seasoned&#8230;&#8221; &#171; DC Works</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=14750#comment-71457</guid>
		<description>[...] who’s worked for the RNC, Roll Call, and earlier this year, New Majority (before it became FrumForum), has signed on as an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] who’s worked for the RNC, Roll Call, and earlier this year, New Majority (before it became FrumForum), has signed on as an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tucker&#8217;s hiring for new site &#124; Obama Biden White House</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/a-note-to-readers/comment-page-1#comment-71063</link>
		<dc:creator>Tucker&#8217;s hiring for new site &#124; Obama Biden White House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=14750#comment-71063</guid>
		<description>[...] who&#8217;s worked for the RNC, Roll Call, and earlier this year, New Majority (before it became FrumForum), has signed on as an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] who&rsquo;s worked for the RNC, Roll Call, and earlier this year, New Majority (before it became FrumForum), has signed on as an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Muny</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/a-note-to-readers/comment-page-1#comment-70971</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Muny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=14750#comment-70971</guid>
		<description>Digg at http://digg.com/politics/David_Frum_s_NewMajority_com_is_now_FrumForum</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg at <a href="http://digg.com/politics/David_Frum_s_NewMajority_com_is_now_FrumForum" rel="nofollow">http://digg.com/politics/David_Frum_s_NewMajority_com_is_now_FrumForum</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewMajority.com has rebranded &#8230; &#171; David Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/a-note-to-readers/comment-page-1#comment-70969</link>
		<dc:creator>NewMajority.com has rebranded &#8230; &#171; David Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=14750#comment-70969</guid>
		<description>[...] NewMajority.com has rebranded&#160;&#8230; Filed under: Media, Politics, Technology, et.al. &#8212; Tags: conservative political philosophy, David Frum, FrumForum.com, GOP, marketing, NewMajority.com, rebranding &#8212; davidkirkpatrick @ 6:02 pm   &#8230; to FrumForum.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NewMajority.com has rebranded&nbsp;&#8230; Filed under: Media, Politics, Technology, et.al. &#8212; Tags: conservative political philosophy, David Frum, FrumForum.com, GOP, marketing, NewMajority.com, rebranding &#8212; davidkirkpatrick @ 6:02 pm   &#8230; to FrumForum.com. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Secular Right &#187; New Majority &#8594; FrumForum</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/a-note-to-readers/comment-page-1#comment-70955</link>
		<dc:creator>Secular Right &#187; New Majority &#8594; FrumForum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=14750#comment-70955</guid>
		<description>[...] the explanation for the change in name. When I saw a page notifying of the change last night on NewMajority I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the explanation for the change in name. When I saw a page notifying of the change last night on NewMajority I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oneon1isto</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/a-note-to-readers/comment-page-1#comment-70922</link>
		<dc:creator>Oneon1isto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=14750#comment-70922</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll still stop by for some different perspectives, regardless of the name.

Although for God sakes, could someone make the new logo transparent?  Come on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll still stop by for some different perspectives, regardless of the name.</p>
<p>Although for God sakes, could someone make the new logo transparent?  Come on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Frumington Post? The Frumdge Report? Fruming Points Memo? The Frumy Beast? &#171; Around The Sphere</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/a-note-to-readers/comment-page-1#comment-70781</link>
		<dc:creator>The Frumington Post? The Frumdge Report? Fruming Points Memo? The Frumy Beast? &#171; Around The Sphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=14750#comment-70781</guid>
		<description>[...] David Frum explains:  From the time we launched the New Majority site, we have had to cope with a problem with our name. Simply put, there are a lot of “New Majorities” out there. There’s one down the road in Virginia, another at the New World Foundation, a conservative 501c4 here, a liberal one there. All this generated serious confusion, but the worst was with the best known New Majority of them all, TheNewMajority in California, because their mission and ours so closely overlapped. That overlap was leading to very unnecessary conflict with people who wanted many of the same reforms that we did. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Frum explains:  From the time we launched the New Majority site, we have had to cope with a problem with our name. Simply put, there are a lot of “New Majorities” out there. There’s one down the road in Virginia, another at the New World Foundation, a conservative 501c4 here, a liberal one there. All this generated serious confusion, but the worst was with the best known New Majority of them all, TheNewMajority in California, because their mission and ours so closely overlapped. That overlap was leading to very unnecessary conflict with people who wanted many of the same reforms that we did. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toddtheconservative</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/a-note-to-readers/comment-page-1#comment-70726</link>
		<dc:creator>Toddtheconservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=14750#comment-70726</guid>
		<description>When you google the new name, some weirld Muslim thing comes up. I hope this doesn&#039;t mess you up with Google. I love this new name. People will know just what it is now. Hey did you guys see this cool video C. Rich put up? I can&#039;t believe she is in the news again.

http://americaspeaksink.com/2009/11/debra-lafave-gets-justice/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you google the new name, some weirld Muslim thing comes up. I hope this doesn&#8217;t mess you up with Google. I love this new name. People will know just what it is now. Hey did you guys see this cool video C. Rich put up? I can&#8217;t believe she is in the news again.</p>
<p><a href="http://americaspeaksink.com/2009/11/debra-lafave-gets-justice/" rel="nofollow">http://americaspeaksink.com/2009/11/debra-lafave-gets-justice/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Does David Frum&#8217;s New Majority Name Change Say About the Conservatism he Advocates? &#171; NewsReal Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/a-note-to-readers/comment-page-1#comment-70674</link>
		<dc:creator>What Does David Frum&#8217;s New Majority Name Change Say About the Conservatism he Advocates? &#171; NewsReal Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=14750#comment-70674</guid>
		<description>[...] today, NewsReal&#8217;s sparring partner David Frum announced he would change the name of his website from New Majority into Frum Forum. It was illustrative of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] today, NewsReal&#8217;s sparring partner David Frum announced he would change the name of his website from New Majority into Frum Forum. It was illustrative of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Cody</title>
		<link>http://www.frumforum.com/a-note-to-readers/comment-page-1#comment-70657</link>
		<dc:creator>James Cody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frumforum.com/?p=14750#comment-70657</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s not too late to give suggestions, I would suggest something with the phrase &quot;Bull Moose&quot; in it (e.g., Bull Moose Majority, Bull Moose Forum, Bull Moose Reform, or something along those lines).  I think that phrase does at least three things.  (1) It conveys what type of majority you hope to build:  a primarily conservative majority, but one based on common sense and first principles, not ideology, and one open to moderate and even progressive ideas, as long as the ideas have substantive merit.  (2) It contrasts with what you are not.  For whatever deranged reason, conservatives seem to hate Teddy Roosevelt.  For example, they set Teddy Roosevelt as the type of conservatism they do not follow (e.g., George Will seems to be overly fond of saying how Taft was the real conservative and Roosevelt was not a true conservative).  At the same time, while providing a contrast with what you are not, I don&#039;t think Teddy Roosevelt is an offensive image that sticks a knife in your conservative opponents&#039; eyes and angers them, the way a name like the New Olympia Snowe Majority might (or, quite frankly, the way Frum Forum might, which says more about Hugh Hewitt and gang than you).  And (3), by going back to history and an important figure in America, it also conveys the level of intellectualism involved in what you are trying to do and that this is a movement about the mind, not visceral, emotional, gut beliefs (e.g., not to be snarky, but I doubt that Sarah Palin, Michelle Bauchmann, Sean Hannity, etc would even know what Bull Moose refers to).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s not too late to give suggestions, I would suggest something with the phrase &#8220;Bull Moose&#8221; in it (e.g., Bull Moose Majority, Bull Moose Forum, Bull Moose Reform, or something along those lines).  I think that phrase does at least three things.  (1) It conveys what type of majority you hope to build:  a primarily conservative majority, but one based on common sense and first principles, not ideology, and one open to moderate and even progressive ideas, as long as the ideas have substantive merit.  (2) It contrasts with what you are not.  For whatever deranged reason, conservatives seem to hate Teddy Roosevelt.  For example, they set Teddy Roosevelt as the type of conservatism they do not follow (e.g., George Will seems to be overly fond of saying how Taft was the real conservative and Roosevelt was not a true conservative).  At the same time, while providing a contrast with what you are not, I don&#8217;t think Teddy Roosevelt is an offensive image that sticks a knife in your conservative opponents&#8217; eyes and angers them, the way a name like the New Olympia Snowe Majority might (or, quite frankly, the way Frum Forum might, which says more about Hugh Hewitt and gang than you).  And (3), by going back to history and an important figure in America, it also conveys the level of intellectualism involved in what you are trying to do and that this is a movement about the mind, not visceral, emotional, gut beliefs (e.g., not to be snarky, but I doubt that Sarah Palin, Michelle Bauchmann, Sean Hannity, etc would even know what Bull Moose refers to).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

